Vegetation Change in a Freshwater Wetland: A Test of a priori Predictions

Thumbnail Image
van der Valk, A. G.
Welling, Charles
Pederson, Roger
Major Professor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
van der Valk, Arnold
Professor Emeritus
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
The Botany Graduate Program offers work for the degrees Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy with a graduate major in Botany, and minor work for students majoring in other departments or graduate programs. Within the Botany Graduate Major, one of the following areas of specialization may be designated: aquatic and wetland ecology, cytology, ecology, morphology, mycology, physiology and molecular biology, or systematics and evolution. Relevant graduate courses that may be counted toward completion of these degrees are offered by the Departments of EEOB and GDCB, and by other departments and programs. The specific requirements for each student’s course distribution and research activities are set by the Program of Study Committee established for each student individually, and must satisfy all requirements of the Graduate College (See Index). GRE (and if necessary, TOEFL) scores are required of all applicants; students are encouraged to contact faculty prior to application.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of

We examined predictions about the vegetation composition of two experimental wetland cells when they were drawn down in 1983. Two approaches were used to make these predictions: extrapolations from vegetation maps and the van der Valk (1981) model of wetland vegetation dynamics. Both sets of data used to make these predictions were collected in 1980 before the emergent vegetation in the cells was destroyed by raising the water level to 1 m above normal. By comparing digitized vegetation maps from 1983 with those from 1980, we determined which vegetation types were present during the drawdown in areas dominated by different preflooding vegetation types. We predicted that each preflooding vegetation type would b.ave only one corresponding drawdown vegetation type. Our prediction was wrong for three of the most widespread preflooding vegetation types. Areas dominated by each of these types in L980 developed two different vegetation types during the drawdown. When both cells were conlidered together, the van der Valk (1981) model, which used the 1980 seed bank data as its primary input, predicted successfully all species that would be present during the 1983 drawdown with a density of one or more seedlings per 10 m2 • However, within an elevation range or within lreas dominated in 1980 by a particular vegetation type, qualitative predictions were less relilble. Even when both cells were considered together, quantitative predictions of average leedling densities were generally too high for most emergent and wet meadow species and too .ow for most annuals. Within an elevation zone or preflooding vegetation type, discrepancies )etween predicted densities and actual densities were even larger. These discrepancies seemed to )e due primarily to differences between environmental conditions in the field in 1983 and in the lhelter where the seed bank study was done in 1980.


This proceeding is from van der Valk, A. G., C. H. Welling and R. L. Pederson. 1989. Vegetation change in a freshwater wetland: a test of a priori predictions. pp. 207-217. In R. R. Sharitz and J. W. Gibbons (Eds.) Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife, proceedings of a symposium held at Charleston, South Carolina, March 24-27, 1986. USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN.