An approach to map soil texture class on the Iowan Erosion Surface

dc.contributor.advisor Miller, Bradley A
dc.contributor.advisor Gelder, Brian K
dc.contributor.advisor Burras, C Lee
dc.contributor.author Ehret, Dustin Lane
dc.contributor.department Agronomy
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-08T23:52:26Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-08T23:52:26Z
dc.date.issued 2021-08
dc.date.updated 2022-11-08T23:52:26Z
dc.description.abstract The objective of this digital soil mapping (DSM) research was to compare approaches of new and legacy dataset combination to produce surface soil texture class maps on the Iowan Erosion Surface physiographic region (MLRA 104) using standard and novel predictor variables (covariates) for modeling. Hand-textured and laboratory-analyzed legacy particle size fraction (PSF) data were obtained from the NRCS National Soil Information System (NASIS). Four models examined various training dataset combinations of new and legacy data. Three PSF sub-models and maps were created for clay, silt, and sand for each parent model. The PSF maps were converted to a soil texture classification map using SAGA 7.4.0 and compared against the NRCS Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO). A set of 320 covariates were provided to Cubist, a machine learning algorithm, to make the data combination models. Twenty-seven rasters were developed to capture eolian sediment transport distribution across the study area. A detailed methodology and case study was used to determine the utility of these rasters as predictors for surface silt content across the Iowan Erosion Surface. The case study showed that the eolian sediment transport distribution rasters were frequently selected by Cubist, but resulted in a higher RMSE and a lower Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) during independent map validation than the model that excluded those covariates. Streaking artifacts present in the directional distance rasters suggest that methodological refinement is needed. At the PSF level, maps that included legacy data as a supplement to the new dataset returned lower RMSE and higher CCC statistics during independent validation. Similarly, the confusion matrices of the soil texture class maps showed that the combined new and legacy data maps outperformed maps trained exclusively with new data. The new data map correctly predicted soil texture class with 27% accuracy, while the maps with new and legacy data had correct classification between 39% and 42%. The results suggest that incorporating new and legacy data is an effective approach for predicting soil texture class. However, the SSURGO soil texture class map outperformed all new and legacy data combination maps with a classification accuracy of 58%.
dc.format.mimetype PDF
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/td-20240329-51
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/jw27mdQv
dc.language.iso en
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.subject.disciplines Soil sciences en_US
dc.subject.disciplines Geographic information science and geodesy en_US
dc.subject.disciplines Geomorphology en_US
dc.subject.keywords Digital soil mapping en_US
dc.subject.keywords Eolian sediment distribution en_US
dc.subject.keywords Iowan Erosion Surface en_US
dc.subject.keywords Legacy data en_US
dc.subject.keywords NASIS en_US
dc.subject.keywords Texture class en_US
dc.title An approach to map soil texture class on the Iowan Erosion Surface
dc.type article en_US
dc.type.genre thesis en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication fdd5c06c-bdbe-469c-a38e-51e664fece7a
thesis.degree.discipline Soil sciences en_US
thesis.degree.discipline Geographic information science and geodesy en_US
thesis.degree.discipline Geomorphology en_US
thesis.degree.grantor Iowa State University en_US
thesis.degree.level thesis $
thesis.degree.name Master of Science en_US
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Ehret_iastate_0097M_19617.pdf
Size:
19.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: