Jørn Utzon: the education of an architect

Thumbnail Image
Date
2003-01-01
Authors
Schirmer, Blair
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Architecture

The Department offers a five-year program leading to the Bachelor of Architecture degree. The program provides opportunities for general education as well as preparation for professional practice and/or graduate study.

The Department of Architecture offers two graduate degrees in architecture: a three-year accredited professional degree (MArch) and a two-semester to three-semester research degree (MS in Arch). Double-degree programs are currently offered with the Department of Community and Regional Planning (MArch/MCRP) and the College of Business (MArch/MBA).

History
The Department of Architecture was established in 1914 as the Department of Structural Design in the College of Engineering. The name of the department was changed to the Department of Architectural Engineering in 1918. In 1945, the name was changed to the Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering. In 1967, the name was changed to the Department of Architecture and formed part of the Design Center. In 1978, the department became part of the College of Design.

Dates of Existence
1914–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Structural Design (1914–1918)
  • Department of Architectural Engineering (1918–1945)
  • Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering (1945–1967)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Architecture
Abstract

No one seems to have noticed the profound rootedness of the genius of Jørn Utzon (b. 1918), architect of the magnificent, exuberant, curvilinear sections of the Sydney Opera House, Silkeborg Art Museum, and Bagsvaerd Church, in the work of that most restrained of architects, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (1886-1969). I trace, through this unlikeliest of confluences, the genesis in Mies's work of Utzon's three most important early, realized works: his first and own house of Hellebæk (Denmark, 1950-52), the House for Svend Middelboe (Holte, Denmark, 1953), and the sixty-three dwelling Kingohusene (Kingo, Denmark, 1956-60). The pedagogical value of this study is, I hope, substantial. Looking at exactly how the perfectly orthogonal Hus Utzon is essential to his great later designs for Sydney, Silkeborg, Bagsvaerd, and Kuwait tells us much about the nature and method of creative work. Utzon never worked for Mies, met him briefly twice, and never admits to other than a very limited presence of Mies in his own architecture. Nonetheless, Utzon's own house at Hellebæk is relentless effort to resurrect and render habitable Mies's Barcelona Pavilion through the obsessive repetition of its proportional scheme, overall form, and consequent shapes, all realized by way of close interpretation of Mies's European villas. Hus Middelboe, by contrast, is a violent opposition to Mies's Farnsworth House, but one so rigorous in its violence that Utzon develops a powerful architectural aesthetic. The Kingohusene's break with Mies is far more radical, involving play and relation. It realizes Mies's discarded early themes for the Weissenhofseidlung housing exhibit, dances with the arrangement of Mies's Lafayette Park housing and, provoked by the exquisitely refined jewel box of Mies's unrealized 1931 Row House, details advances and variations that render this last merely prototype. What Utzon builds through 1956 in response to Mies extends into the designs for the Sydney Opera House, particularly in Utzon's reconception of Alvar Aalto's Library of Viipuri: His approach evolves from a means of generating form to the far more valuable result of generating method. Utzon next applies his method to engage Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier All work becomes fair game for contention and play, and no architect is more bent than Utzon on reconceiving the canon. For balance I include a thorough survey of Utzon's published work, presenting it as I think he would have us understand it, a survey of critics who write on Utzon, and a three hundred entry annotated bibliography detailing these. It is his work in response to Mies that constitutes Utzon's primary education.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2003