The development of in-process surface roughness prediction systems in turning operation using accelerometer
The development of in-process surface roughness prediction systems in turning operation using accelerometer
dc.contributor.advisor | Joseph C. Chen | |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Hanming | |
dc.contributor.department | Industrial Education and Technology | |
dc.date | 2018-08-24T18:03:52.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-02T05:41:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-02T05:41:47Z | |
dc.date.copyright | Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2001 | |
dc.date.issued | 2001-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Three in-process surface roughness prediction (ISRP) systems using linear multiple regression, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy nets algorisms, respectively, were developed to allow the prediction of real time surface roughness of a work piece on a turning operation. The surface roughness is predicted from feed rate, spindle speed, depth of cut, and machining vibration that is detected and collected by an accelerometer.;Two groups of data were collected for two cutters with nose radii of 0.016 and 0.031 inches, respective. A total of 162 training data sets and 54 testing data sets for each cutter were applied to train and test the system. While the multiple-regression-based system applied the linear relationships of the dependent variables and the dependent variable for the prediction, the fuzzy-logic-based and the fuzzy-nets-based systems relied on fuzzy theory for the prediction. The fuzzy rule banks employed in the fuzzy-logic-based system was generated with expert's experiences as well as observation results from the experiments. Whereas, the rule banks employed in the fuzz-nets-system were rule banks self-extracted from the training data by the fuzzy-nets self-learning algorithm.;The predicted surface roughness values were compared with corresponding measured values. The average prediction accuracy with the three algorithms, linear multiple regression, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy nets algorisms, was 92.78%, 89.06%, and 95.70%, respectively. The use of the accelerometer was found valuable in increasing the prediction The Fuzzy-nets-based In-process Surface Roughness Prediction System was considered the best among the three tested systems. This conclusion relies on not only the best average prediction accuracy achieved, but also the self-learning ability of the fuzzy nets algorism.</p> | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier | archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/435/ | |
dc.identifier.articleid | 1434 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 6073779 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-190 | |
dc.identifier.s3bucket | isulib-bepress-aws-west | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | rtd/435 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/76974 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.source.bitstream | archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/435/r_3003249.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 00:16:10 UTC 2022 | |
dc.subject.disciplines | Industrial Engineering | |
dc.subject.keywords | Industrial education and technology | |
dc.title | The development of in-process surface roughness prediction systems in turning operation using accelerometer | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.type.genre | dissertation | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
thesis.degree.level | dissertation | |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy |
File
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1