Retrieval Enhances Eyewitness Suggestibility to Misinformation in Free and Cued Recall

dc.contributor.author Wilford, Miko
dc.contributor.author Chan, Jason
dc.contributor.author Chan, Jason
dc.contributor.author Tuhn, Sam
dc.contributor.department Psychology
dc.date 2018-02-15T19:01:39.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T06:24:56Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T06:24:56Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2014
dc.date.embargo 2015-01-26
dc.date.issued 2014-03-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Immediately recalling a witnessed event can increase people’s susceptibility to later postevent misinformation. But this <em>retrieval-enhanced suggestibility</em> (RES) effect has been shown only when the initial recall test included specific questions that reappeared on the final test. Moreover, it is unclear whether this phenomenon is affected by the centrality of event details. These limitations make it difficult to generalize RES to criminal investigations, which often begin with free recall prior to more specific queries from legal officials and attorneys. In 3 experiments, we examined the influence of test formats (free recall vs. cued recall) and centrality of event details (central vs. peripheral) on RES. In Experiment 1, both the initial and final tests were cued recall. In Experiment 2, the initial test was free recall and the final test was cued recall. In Experiment 3, both the initial and final tests were free recall. Initial testing increased misinformation reporting on the final test for peripheral details in all experiments, but the effect was significant for central details only after aggregating the data from all 3 experiments. These results show that initial free recall can produce RES, and more broadly, that free recall can potentiate subsequent learning of complex prose materials. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This is a manuscript of an article from Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 20 (2014): 81, doi:<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000001" target="_blank">10.1037/xap0000001</a>. Posted with permission. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/psychology_pubs/12/
dc.identifier.articleid 1021
dc.identifier.contextkey 6566636
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath psychology_pubs/12
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/57942
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/psychology_pubs/12/2014_Chan_RetrievalEnhances.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 19:04:54 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1037/xap0000001
dc.subject.disciplines Cognitive Psychology
dc.subject.disciplines Evidence
dc.subject.keywords misinformation effect
dc.subject.keywords eyewitness memory
dc.subject.keywords investigative interviewing
dc.subject.keywords false memory
dc.subject.keywords testing effect
dc.title Retrieval Enhances Eyewitness Suggestibility to Misinformation in Free and Cued Recall
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6b21bbe1-e5e9-4996-9c20-866944f45210
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 796236b3-85a0-4cde-b154-31da9e94ed42
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2014_Chan_RetrievalEnhances.pdf
Size:
338.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections