Land tenure, agri-environmental policy, and conservation practice use in Iowa

Thumbnail Image
Date
2020-01-01
Authors
Sawadgo, Wendiam
Major Professor
Advisor
Alejandro Plastina
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Economics

The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 to teach economic theory as a truth of industrial life, and was very much concerned with applying economics to business and industry, particularly agriculture. Between 1910 and 1967 it showed the growing influence of other social studies, such as sociology, history, and political science. Today it encompasses the majors of Agricultural Business (preparing for agricultural finance and management), Business Economics, and Economics (for advanced studies in business or economics or for careers in financing, management, insurance, etc).

History
The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 under the Division of Industrial Science (later College of Liberal Arts and Sciences); it became co-directed by the Division of Agriculture in 1919. In 1910 it became the Department of Economics and Political Science. In 1913 it became the Department of Applied Economics and Social Science; in 1924 it became the Department of Economics, History, and Sociology; in 1931 it became the Department of Economics and Sociology. In 1967 it became the Department of Economics, and in 2007 it became co-directed by the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Liberal Arts and Sciences, and Business.

Dates of Existence
1898–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Economic Science (1898–1910)
  • Department of Economics and Political Science (1910-1913)
  • Department of Applied Economics and Social Science (1913–1924)
  • Department of Economics, History and Sociology (1924–1931)
  • Department of Economics and Sociology (1931–1967)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract

This dissertation broadly looks at farmers' use of agricultural practices that affect water quality in Iowa. Primary themes across these three studies include (1) farmers' willingness to use conservation practices that can improve soil health and water quality, (2) the effects of agri-environmental policy on adoption of conservation practices, and (3) the effects of land tenure on farmers' use of inputs and conservation practices.

Chapter 2 examines whether cost-share programs – which pay farmers to use a specific conservation practice – have had the desired effect of increasing cover-crop use in Iowa. Using a matching estimator, I conclude that cost-share recipients plant cover crops on an additional 15% of their farmland than they would have in absence of payment.

In chapter 3, I study how landowner characteristics affect the use of conservation practices. The chapter focuses on whether leasing versus operating owned farmland decreases the use of conservation practices. I find that cover crops, buffer strips, and ponds/sediment basins are used at lower rates on rented farmland than on owner-operated farmland. However, no-till is used at a higher rate on rented farmland compared to owner-operated farmland. I also find that non-operator landowners have practices on their farmland at lesser rates than do landowners who currently farm.

Chapter 4 uses data envelopment analysis and a panel of farms to estimate an efficient input-output frontier for corn production and calculate farms' efficiencies. I then evaluate how productivity has changed over time and whether efficiency differs by farm size and land tenure. Technical efficiency increased between the first half of the period (2011-2014) and the second (2015-2018). Additionally, I find that larger farms are more technically efficient than smaller farms, and fully rented farms more technically efficient than fully owner-operated farms.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Fri May 01 00:00:00 UTC 2020