A theoretical and financial analysis of pork production contracts

Thumbnail Image
Date
1993
Authors
Hillburn, Chris
Major Professor
Advisor
James Kliebenstein
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Economics

The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 to teach economic theory as a truth of industrial life, and was very much concerned with applying economics to business and industry, particularly agriculture. Between 1910 and 1967 it showed the growing influence of other social studies, such as sociology, history, and political science. Today it encompasses the majors of Agricultural Business (preparing for agricultural finance and management), Business Economics, and Economics (for advanced studies in business or economics or for careers in financing, management, insurance, etc).

History
The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 under the Division of Industrial Science (later College of Liberal Arts and Sciences); it became co-directed by the Division of Agriculture in 1919. In 1910 it became the Department of Economics and Political Science. In 1913 it became the Department of Applied Economics and Social Science; in 1924 it became the Department of Economics, History, and Sociology; in 1931 it became the Department of Economics and Sociology. In 1967 it became the Department of Economics, and in 2007 it became co-directed by the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Liberal Arts and Sciences, and Business.

Dates of Existence
1898–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Economic Science (1898–1910)
  • Department of Economics and Political Science (1910-1913)
  • Department of Applied Economics and Social Science (1913–1924)
  • Department of Economics, History and Sociology (1924–1931)
  • Department of Economics and Sociology (1931–1967)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract

A theoretical model of pork production contracts using the principal-agent framework is used to investigate optimal compensation schedules for both feeders and owners. The optimal compensation schedules derived may take on a variety of forms, but all payment schedules should contain an inverse relationship between the quality and quantity of inputs provided by the owner and the compensation provided to the feeder;A simulation analysis is used to investigate the risk and returns to both the feeder and the owner for feeder pig finishing and feeder pig production contracts. For the owner the returns from a contract are similar (though somewhat smaller) to that of a sole proprietor, and the owner is able to reduce risk. The contract feeder's risk and returns are substantially reduced as compared to a sole proprietor. For both the feeder and the owner some contracts are found to dominate other contracts (as measured by stochastic dominance). Pork production contracts may or may not be equitable arrangements for a feeder, depending upon the specific compensation schedule, the investment in facilities required, and the actions of the owner. Owners, like sole proprietors, are subject to wide variations in returns due to their acceptance of price risk and some production risk, but avoid the risk of large investments in facilities through a contractual arrangement with a feeder;Feeders' risks in a contractual arrangement are largely due to biological factors such as feed efficiency and death loss. Thus there exists a large difference in expected returns between feeders with good production efficiency versus feeders with poor production efficiency;Feeders face additional risk if investment in facilities is financed with a term loan that does not match the term or length of the contractual arrangement. The possibility of termination of the contract or an alteration of terms by the owner places additional financial risk upon the feeder and the feeder's lender;Contracts alter the feeder's cost structure in that fixed costs represent a large percentage of total costs. This implies an increase in operating leverage and an increased sensitivity to changes in total revenue as compared to a sole proprietor.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Keywords
Copyright
Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1993