Tillage effects on selected soil physical properties

Thumbnail Image
Hill, Robert
Major Professor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit

The Department of Agronomy seeks to teach the study of the farm-field, its crops, and its science and management. It originally consisted of three sub-departments to do this: Soils, Farm-Crops, and Agricultural Engineering (which became its own department in 1907). Today, the department teaches crop sciences and breeding, soil sciences, meteorology, agroecology, and biotechnology.

The Department of Agronomy was formed in 1902. From 1917 to 1935 it was known as the Department of Farm Crops and Soils.

Dates of Existence

Historical Names

  • Department of Farm Crops and Soils (1917–1935)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of

A study was conducted to determine the effect of conservation and conventional tillage on soil bulk density, soil strength, soil water retention, and pore size distribution. Two locations, each having randomized block designs with 3 replications of continuous corn plots under no-tillage, reduced tillage, and conventional tillage, were used. One location, site 1, was in its second year of tillage experimentation, while the other location, site 2, was in its eighth year;Tillage treatment did not have a statistically significant effect on bulk density. Depth had a significant effect on bulk density. Bulk density increased with depth for the 3 tillage treatments at both sites;Tillage treatments had significant effects on soil strength at site 2, but not at site 1. Strength of soils at site 2 under reduced tillage was not significantly different than for soils under no-tillage, but the soils under both of these tillage systems had significantly greater soil strength than conventionally tilled soils. The pattern of differences in soil strength due to tillage treatment was the same at site 1, but the differences were not statistically significant;Reduced tilled soil generally retained a significantly (LSD(,0.05)) larger quantity of water than conventionally tilled soil, but soils under no-tillage were not significantly different from soils under reduced tillage or conventional tillage in their water retention characteristics. Differences in water retention between tillage treatments were not significant at site 2, but trends in the means comparison similar to site 1 were observed. Analysis of variance failed to show significant tillage effects for the pore size distribution regardless of pore radius interval partitioning. Trends indicate that soil tilled conventionally has a larger proportion of its pore size distribution in pores > 15 (mu)m.r compared to the soils under conservation tillage.

Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1984