Barriers to interorganizational relationships: a comparative analysis

dc.contributor.author Hoban, Thomas
dc.contributor.department Sociology and Anthropology
dc.date 2018-08-15T06:19:25.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:04:38Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:04:38Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1986
dc.date.issued 1986
dc.description.abstract <p>The problem of soil erosion persists despite 50 years of public programs, costing over 20 billion. This study approaches this problem by examining the frequency of interaction among organizations involved in promoting soil conservation and providing farmers with assistance. Interorganizational relationships (IOR) are thought to have an important influence on the effectiveness of local conservation programs;Relationships among four federal (USDA) agencies involved with soil conservation at the local (county) level are studied: the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), the Cooperative Extension Service (CES); the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS), and the Farmer's Home Administration (FmHA). Telephone interviews with the local directors of each organization, in each of 17 counties (n = 68), were conducted in Spring 1985;The relative effect of five kinds of barriers on frequency of IOR are examined: perceptions of the organizational environment; perceptions of IOR; perceived resource scarcity; perceived interpersonal conflict with other organizations; and distances between offices. The conceptual framework is built on resource dependency, political economy, and interpersonal conflict theories;Analysis of variance indicates that the organizations differ significantly in their perceptions of many barriers to IOR and reported frequency of many types of IOR behavior. Multiple regression models are tested with three types of IOR as dependent variables: farmer referral, informal interaction, and formal meetings. Barriers are entered individually as independent variables, after controlling on the respondent's type of organization;The most important barriers are: distance between offices, perceived differences in personalities, and perceptions that others are unwilling to cooperate. Barriers having a moderate effect on IOR, include perceptions of: lack of time, changing guidelines from above, uncertainty of future funding, and fear of lost credit or visibility for one's own programs because of IOR. The type of organization has an important controlling influence on the relationship of certain barriers to some types of IOR with different organizations.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8082/
dc.identifier.articleid 9081
dc.identifier.contextkey 6328964
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-526
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/8082
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/81031
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8082/r_8627117.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:05:49 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Social Psychology and Interaction
dc.subject.disciplines Sociology
dc.subject.keywords Sociology
dc.subject.keywords Rural
dc.subject.keywords Sociology and anthropology
dc.title Barriers to interorganizational relationships: a comparative analysis
dc.type dissertation
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
r_8627117.pdf
Size:
3.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: