Employee Benefit Packages in the Swine Industry

dc.contributor.author Hurley, Terrance
dc.contributor.author Orazem, Peter
dc.contributor.author Orazem, Peter
dc.contributor.author Kliebenstein, James
dc.contributor.author Miller, Dale
dc.date 2018-02-13T00:40:37.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:59:48Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:59:48Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1997
dc.date.embargo 2012-08-22
dc.date.issued 1997
dc.description.abstract <p>Benefit packages and working conditions are important to employees in the swine industry, just as is the salary level. Employees indicated that there are trade-offs between salary levels and the benefit packages and working conditions. For example, they indicated that incentive plans, on average, were equivalent to about $3,873 in salary to employees (Table 1). They also indicated that the provision of insurance as part of the employment conditions was important. The trade-off was that $1.00 of insurance premium was equivalent to about $2.59 in salary. While this level of trade-off was higher than expected, it does indicate that workers do value both salary and benefits and trade one for the other in evaluating compensation offers. There are two possible reasons for the high level of trade-off, one being the tax benefits of insurance premiums which are provided by the employer, and the second being that the employer may be able to obtain benefit packages in group policies such as major medical, dental, etc., at a lower rate than what the individual employee could receive on a single or family policy.</p> <p>Employee working conditions in the facilities were found to be important and significant. The value of working in a facility that had excellent environmental conditions in terms of dust and gases was worth about $10,000 over that of working in a facility that was ranked as good. The value of working in a good versus a fair rated facility was $7,900. Again, here, the values seem to be inflated, but the bottom line is that employees value working in facilities that have better environments and are willing to accept lower salaries in order to work in safer environments. Employees also indicated that the mere presence or availability of masks or respirators to wear in the production facility had a positive benefit.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/swinereports_1996/28/
dc.identifier.articleid 1035
dc.identifier.contextkey 3248026
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath swinereports_1996/28
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/91005
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Animal Science Research Reports
dc.relation.ispartofseries ASL R1399
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/swinereports_1996/28/asl_1399.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 23:08:21 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Animal Sciences
dc.subject.keywords ASL R1399
dc.title Employee Benefit Packages in the Swine Industry
dc.type article
dc.type.genre management_economics
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c9a0d8cb-216b-42cb-a055-23a56438e364
relation.isSeriesOfPublication 7f3839b7-b833-4418-a6fa-adda2b23950a
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
asl_1399.pdf
Size:
84.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections