Performance of Growing Pigs Fed Using Electronic Versus Commercial Feeders Casey, David Dekkers, Jack 2018-02-13T00:04:05.000 2020-07-02T07:01:36Z 2020-07-02T07:01:36Z Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2003 2012-08-14 2003-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The effect of electronic feeders on performance of growing boars and gilts was evaluated. Yorkshire boars and gilts (n=475) were randomly assigned to pens with single-space FIRE (electronic) feeders and pens with fivespace SMIDLEY feeders. Pigs began and ended test at an average body weight of 39 and 116 kg. Over the whole test period, pigs on electronic feeders did not differ significantly in growth rate, backfat thickness, and loin muscle area from pigs on commercial feeders. They did, however, use less feed and converted this more efficiently. Further inspection of growth and feed intake curves revealed that gilts on electronic feeders used less feed and grew slightly slower, in particular during early growth, but no differences were found for boars. Results indicate that electronic feeders may cause a genotype by environment interaction for gilts but not for boars.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/
dc.identifier.articleid 1007
dc.identifier.contextkey 3212455
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath swinereports_2002/6
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Animal Science Research Reports
dc.relation.ispartofseries ASL R1800
dc.source.bitstream archive/|||Sat Jan 15 01:04:53 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Animal Sciences
dc.subject.keywords ASL R1800
dc.title Performance of Growing Pigs Fed Using Electronic Versus Commercial Feeders
dc.type article
dc.type.genre breeding_physiology
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isSeriesOfPublication 7f3839b7-b833-4418-a6fa-adda2b23950a
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
42.08 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format