Quantile POD for nondestructive evaluation with hit–miss data

dc.contributor.author Koh, Yew-Meng
dc.contributor.author Meeker, William
dc.contributor.author Meeker, William
dc.contributor.department Statistics
dc.contributor.department Center for Nondestructive Evaluation (CNDE)
dc.date 2019-09-22T12:25:36.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:57:39Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:57:39Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017
dc.date.embargo 2020-03-01
dc.date.issued 2019-03-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Probability of detection (POD) is commonly used to measure a nondestructive evaluation (NDE) inspection procedure’s performance. Due to inherent variability in the inspection procedure caused by variability in factors such as crack morphology and operators, it is important, for some purposes, to model POD as a random function. Traditionally, inspection variabilities are pooled and an estimate of the mean POD (averaged over all sources of variability) is reported. In some applications it is important to know how poor typical inspections might be, and this question is answered by estimating a quantile of the POD distribution. This article shows how to fit and compare different models to repeated-measures hit--miss data with multiple inspections with different operators for each crack and shows how to estimate the mean POD as well as quantiles of the POD distribution for binary (hit--miss) NDE data. We also show how to compute credible intervals (quantifying uncertainty due to limited data) for these quantities using a Bayesian estimation approach. We use NDE for the detection of fatigue cracks as the motivating example, but the concepts apply more generally to other NDE applications areas.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in <em>Research in Nondestructive Evaluation</em> on March 1, 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2017.1374493" target="_blank">10.1080/09349847.2017.1374493</a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_pubs/285/
dc.identifier.articleid 1287
dc.identifier.contextkey 15330125
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath stat_las_pubs/285
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/90604
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_pubs/285/2019_MeekerWilliam_QuantilePOD.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 23:11:29 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1080/09349847.2017.1374493
dc.subject.disciplines Materials Science and Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Statistics and Probability
dc.subject.keywords Bayesian estimation
dc.subject.keywords binary regression
dc.subject.keywords have cracks
dc.subject.keywords will travel
dc.subject.keywords quantile POD
dc.subject.keywords random effects
dc.title Quantile POD for nondestructive evaluation with hit–miss data
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication a1ae45d5-fca5-4709-bed9-3dd8efdba54e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 264904d9-9e66-4169-8e11-034e537ddbca
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2019_MeekerWilliam_QuantilePOD.pdf
Size:
548.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections