Sow and Litter Performance for Individual Crate and Group Hoop Barn Gestation Housing Systems: A Progress Report

dc.contributor.author Honeyman, Mark
dc.contributor.author Harmon, Jay
dc.contributor.author Mabry, John
dc.contributor.author Johnson, Colin
dc.contributor.author Harmon, Jay
dc.contributor.author Hummel, D.
dc.date 2018-02-13T00:04:59.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T07:01:31Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T07:01:31Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2003
dc.date.embargo 2012-08-14
dc.date.issued 2003-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The effects of swine gestation housing on sow and litter performance were evaluated at the Iowa State University Lauren Christian Swine Research and Demonstration Farm near Atlantic, IA. The gestation housing systems were 1) individual gestation crates in a mechanically ventilated, partially slatted floor, manure flush confinement building (CRATE); and 2) group pens in deep-bedded, naturally ventilated hoop structures (HOOP). The HOOP sows were fed with individual feed stalls.</p> <p>The sows were artificially inseminated in a confinement breeding barn with slatted floors and were later moved to their assigned gestation housing treatment. Sows continued in the same gestation housing their entire time at the farm. All first-litter gilts were gestated in individual gestation crates to minimize sow size differential in the groups. There were 35 sows per group in the HOOP barns. Farrowing occurred every 2 weeks on a year-round basis. All sows were fed 4.5 lb/day and increased to 6 lb/day during the last trimester of gestation. During the winter HOOP sows were fed 25% more and CRATE sows were fed 5% more.</p> <p>Reproductive performance was summarized for 433 litters during the period March 2001 through September 2002. This is a progress report of a continuing study. Preliminary trends were a shorter wean-to-breed interval, fewer still born and mummified pigs (combined), one more live pig born per litter, two more pigs weaned/sow/year, and much lower sow culling and mortality rates for HOOP sows compared to CRATE sows. The preliminary data suggest that gestating sows can be successfully housed in deepbedded hoop barns equipped with individual feeding stalls.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/swinereports_2002/18/
dc.identifier.articleid 1013
dc.identifier.contextkey 3212765
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath swinereports_2002/18
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/91321
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Animal Science Research Reports
dc.relation.ispartofseries ASL R1816
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/swinereports_2002/18/asl_1816.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 21:32:18 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Animal Sciences
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.subject.keywords ASL R1816
dc.title Sow and Litter Performance for Individual Crate and Group Hoop Barn Gestation Housing Systems: A Progress Report
dc.type article
dc.type.genre management_economics
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 863ffed7-5274-46d6-95cc-47c7d0d5b6ab
relation.isSeriesOfPublication 7f3839b7-b833-4418-a6fa-adda2b23950a
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
asl_1816.pdf
Size:
11.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections