Faster, normal or slower?: the effects of speech rates on high-intermediate ESL learners' listening comprehension of academic lectures

dc.contributor.author Le, Fushun
dc.contributor.department Department of English
dc.date 2018-08-22T21:31:57.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T07:49:57Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T07:49:57Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2006
dc.date.issued 2006-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The purpose of this study is to 1) identify whether three speech rates (SR) (normal, faster and slower) have different effects on high-intermediate ESL learners' listening comprehension of academic lectures, and if so, to determine which SR is the most beneficial to the learners' comprehension; and 2) to identify learners' perception of SRs and reasons for lecture incomprehensibility. Eleven international students were asked to listen to three long academic lectures on unfamiliar topics and answer multiple choice comprehension questions, which was followed by a brief survey of their perception of the SR appropriateness and lecture difficulty. The original SRs of the lectures, 157 wpm/3.40 sps, 168 wpm/3.34 sps and 173 wpm/3.33 sps, were set as the normal SRs, which were compressed and expanded with sound editing software by 15% into the faster SRs (181 wpm/3.91 sps, 193 wpm/3.84 sps and 199 wpm/3.83 sps) and the slower SRs (134 wpm/2.89 sps, 143 wpm/2.83 sps and 147 wpm/2.83 sps). Comprehension scores revealed no significant differences in the mean scores obtained at these SRs, which tentatively suggests that neither an ideal SR nor a "threshold" SR exists within the SR range between 134 wpm/2.89 sps and 199 wpm/3.83 sps. At a close-to-significant level, the higher scores obtained at the slower SR, a rate preferred by the subjects, were taken to suggest that the most facilitative SR is likely to be lower than 134 wpm/2.89 sps. Topical and lexical unfamiliarity and SR were reported by the subjects as the major factors affecting lecture comprehension. The non-significant findings were interpreted as being attributed to the low modification rate, the small n and the low reliability of the comprehension questions. Despite its inconclusive results, the study offers both theoretical and practical implications. It highlights the importance of SR in L2 listening comprehension research, where spoken materials rich in acoustic features are recommended to be used as input. Besides informing L2 teachers of important factors that affect listening comprehension, it also raises lecturers' awareness of slowing down for L2 learners.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/16121/
dc.identifier.articleid 17120
dc.identifier.contextkey 7227780
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-6661
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/16121
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/69826
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/16121/ISU_1648362.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 20:55:28 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education
dc.subject.disciplines English Language and Literature
dc.subject.disciplines First and Second Language Acquisition
dc.subject.keywords English
dc.subject.keywords Teaching English as a second language/applied linguistics
dc.title Faster, normal or slower?: the effects of speech rates on high-intermediate ESL learners' listening comprehension of academic lectures
dc.type thesis en_US
dc.type.genre thesis en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a7f2ac65-89b1-4c12-b0c2-b9bb01dd641b
thesis.degree.level thesis
thesis.degree.name Master of Arts
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ISU_1648362.pdf
Size:
4.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: