An assessment tool to determine the appropriateness of engineering design projects for gender bias, ambiguity, and major relatedness
Date
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Engineering design learning is one of the critical components for an engineering
degree; thus, engineering design projects are commonly included in engineering curricula
to help students cultivate design thinking and creative problem-solving skills. However,
an engineering design project is prone to the following issues if it is not appropriately
provided to engineering students. First, gender bias can occur when the design project is
perceived to be more skewed to one gender in comparison to the other. Second, major
relatedness can occur when the discipline of the design project is not related to the chosen
major and interest areas of a student. Third, ambiguity can arise from the lack of clarity
on design objectives and the scope. These issues can lead to diminished engagement and
self-efficacy for engineering students. To manage these issues, this study performed a
preliminary work to build an evaluation tool that properly assesses engineering design
projects. The evaluation tool is based on a measurement system that helps educators to
evaluate the appropriateness of the design projects through designated questionnaires.
The assessment tool for design projects in this study would help engineering educators to
better prepare and revise their design projects so that the engineering design projects can
improve student engagement and learning performance.