An analysis of perceptions of shared decision making in early stages of implementation as related to selected factors associated with school improvement

dc.contributor.advisor James Sweeney
dc.contributor.author Renze, Thomas
dc.contributor.department Department of Curriculum and Instruction (1990–2012)
dc.date 2018-08-16T07:24:02.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:14:58Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:14:58Z
dc.date.copyright Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1991
dc.date.issued 1991
dc.description.abstract <p>This study analyzed perceptions of shared decision making (SDM) in early stages of implementation as related to selected factors associated with school improvement. The selected factors were restructuring of roles and decision-making processes, empowerment, involvement in decisions, collegiality, collaboration, and teaching and learning;Data were collected from the Marshalltown Community School District's Shared Decision Making project during the 1990-91 school year. Two methods were used to collect data. The first was a 52-item survey of all district staff members (N = 602) in January, 1991. The return rate was 64%. Survey data were disaggregated according to job categories and according to membership and nonmembership on building planning teams. The second method of data collection was individual interviews. Interviews were conducted with a stratified sample of 104 staff members from all job categories in February and March, 1991. Interviewers used a 23-question open-ended instrument in individual structured interviews. A three-step process was used to analyze and summarize interview data;Within the limitations of this study the following conclusions were reached: (1) SDM roles and decision-making processes are not clear to the majority of staff; staff is not sure who is supposed to make what decisions or how they are to be made. (2) Staff members view empowerment as a desirable goal, but half the staff don't feel empowered in areas that affect their jobs. (3) Planning team members are more positive than nonmembers about SDM, its potential for producing significant change, and its potential for success. (4) Collegiality exists within the buildings. Staff feels colleagues respect their opinions. (5) Most staff perceive themselves as collaborating with colleagues to address and solve problems. (6) The SDM project has produced little effect upon teaching and learning. (7) SDM is viewed as a very desirable goal, but it is being practiced only to a moderate degree in the buildings. (8) Classified staff have little knowledge of the project and its purposes. (9) Communications about the SDM project have been ineffective. (10) Staff is positive toward the project, but don't think that literature and research have affected how teachers do things.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/9677/
dc.identifier.articleid 10676
dc.identifier.contextkey 6360811
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-9300
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/9677
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/82801
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/9677/r_9212180.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:36:09 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Educational Administration and Supervision
dc.subject.keywords School management and organization
dc.subject.keywords Professional studies in education
dc.subject.keywords Education (Educational administration)
dc.title An analysis of perceptions of shared decision making in early stages of implementation as related to selected factors associated with school improvement
dc.type dissertation
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 2b688c4d-14d7-4296-9417-6519e4078c32
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
r_9212180.pdf
Size:
3.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: