Individual decisions and outside influences affecting U.S. commodity markets and cropland used for grain production

dc.contributor.advisor Dermot Hayes
dc.contributor.author Kauffman, Nathan
dc.contributor.department Economics
dc.date 2018-08-11T15:02:16.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T02:42:09Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T02:42:09Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2012
dc.date.embargo 2013-06-05
dc.date.issued 2012-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>This dissertation is composed of four essays broadly focusing on U.S. commodity markets with an emphasis on grains and cropland used to produce grains. The essays each address specific factors surrounding commodity markets and agricultural land-use which have been relevant in individual decision-making processes or recent policy debates. The first essay is motivated by data which reveal that grain producers' hedging decisions have changed over time, and have been strongly correlated with futures price levels. Using prospect theory as the underlying behavioral framework, there are two main goals: to outline a mechanism that allows for this correlation, and to illustrate the corresponding implications for cash prices and volatility at harvest. The second essay uses an empirical approach to determine the extent to which speculative trading has influenced commodity futures prices and volatility. Tests of Granger causality are conducted in the time domain for each of 19 actively-traded commodities individually, as well as in aggregate, using seemingly unrelated regression analysis. Tests of causality are also conducted in the frequency domain to distinguish between long-run and short-run causality. The third essay seeks to provide clarity to the debate on the role of speculation in commodity derivative markets by recognizing that speculation may take more than one form. Encompassing two measures of speculation, an error correction model is used to test for a long-run level relationship between futures prices and speculation and between volatility and speculation. The goal of the final essay is to explore the implications of conventional agricultural life cycle assessments (LCAs) that fail to account for the opportunity cost associated with land scarcity. A model to represent the interests associated with biofuel production in the United States is constructed that minimizes environmental damages and accounts for the external benefits to production by choosing acreage optimally. Corn and switchgrass are modeled as crops competing for land-use.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12361/
dc.identifier.articleid 3368
dc.identifier.contextkey 3437727
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-1229
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath etd/12361
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/26550
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12361/Kauffman_iastate_0097E_12572.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 19:19:29 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural and Resource Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Economics
dc.subject.keywords Causality
dc.subject.keywords Commodity Markets
dc.subject.keywords Land-Use
dc.subject.keywords Prospect Theory
dc.subject.keywords Speculation
dc.title Individual decisions and outside influences affecting U.S. commodity markets and cropland used for grain production
dc.type article
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4c5aa914-a84a-4951-ab5f-3f60f4b65b3d
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Kauffman_iastate_0097E_12572.pdf
Size:
2.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: