Improved production systems for common bean on Ferralsol soil in south-central Uganda

dc.contributor.author Goettsch, Lance
dc.contributor.author Lenssen, Andrew
dc.contributor.author Yost, Russell
dc.contributor.author Luvaga, Ebby
dc.contributor.author Lenssen, Andrew
dc.contributor.author Semalulu, Onesmus
dc.contributor.author Tenywa, Moses
dc.contributor.author Miiro, Richard
dc.contributor.author Mazur, Robert
dc.contributor.department Economics
dc.contributor.department Sociology
dc.contributor.department Agronomy
dc.date 2018-02-19T06:57:42.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T23:04:17Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T23:04:17Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017
dc.date.issued 2017-06-08
dc.description.abstract <p>Common bean (<em>Phaseolus vulgaris </em>L.) is the most important source of dietary protein in Uganda but current grain yields are low. Production is particularly low on the degraded Ferralsol soils that dominate the landscape because these soils are generally weathered, acidic and infertile. A study was done on a Ferralsol soil in Masaka District, Uganda to compare productivity and economic return to labor and management (ERLM) for four bean cultivars grown under three management systems. The experimental design was a randomized complete block in a split-plot arrangement. Management system was the whole-plot factor and included the Conventional Farmer (CFS), Improved Farmer (IFS), and High Input systems (HIS). Management systems differed for seed fungicide treatment (no vs. yes), seeding density (10 vs. 20 seed m-2), plant configuration (scatter vs. rows), fertilizer applications (P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn and S), rhizobium inoculation (no vs. yes), pesticide applications (no vs. yes), and frequency and timing of weeding. Subplots were four common bean cultivars that differed for resistance to foliar pathogens and the ability to tolerate low soil fertility. Increasing management level and planting bean cultivars tolerant to common bean diseases and low soil fertility improved bean grain yield. The only grain yield differences observed were between cultivars in the 2015A season; NABE 14 had greatest grain yield, 168% greater than that of NABE 15. The HIS with NABE 14 (1274 kg ha-1), the HIS with NABE 4 (1225 kg ha-1), and the IFS with NABE 14 (1025 kg ha-1) had the greatest grain yield. The ERLM was only profitable for the CFS ($40 ha-1); cultivars did not differ. Farmers planting bean on Ferralsol soil can improve yields with higher input systems but the tested systems were not profitable.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is published as Goettsch, Lance H., Andrew W. Lenssen, Russell S. Yost, Ebby S. Luvaga, Onesmus Semalulu, Moses Tenywa, Richard Miiro, and Robert E. Mazur. "Improved production systems for common bean on Ferralsol soil in south-central Uganda." <em>African Journal of Agricultural Research</em> 12, no. 23 (2017): 1959-1969. doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2017.12122%20" target="_blank">10.5897/AJAR2017.12122 </a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs/323/
dc.identifier.articleid 1328
dc.identifier.contextkey 11313073
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath agron_pubs/323
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/4669
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs/323/2017_Lenssen_ImprovedProduction.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 23:35:36 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.5897/AJAR2017.12122
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural Science
dc.subject.disciplines Agronomy and Crop Sciences
dc.subject.disciplines Rural Sociology
dc.subject.keywords Phaseolus vulgaris L.
dc.subject.keywords soil fertility
dc.subject.keywords crop management systems
dc.subject.keywords improved cultivars
dc.subject.keywords profitability
dc.title Improved production systems for common bean on Ferralsol soil in south-central Uganda
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 7f67ca95-722b-4dfd-8f49-56ff95980240
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4c5aa914-a84a-4951-ab5f-3f60f4b65b3d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 84d83d09-42ff-424d-80f2-a35244368443
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication fdd5c06c-bdbe-469c-a38e-51e664fece7a
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2017_Lenssen_ImprovedProduction.pdf
Size:
475.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections