Manure Production and Nutrient Concentrations from High-rise Layer Houses
Date
Authors
Xin, Hongwei
Xin, Hongwei
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Series
Department
Abstract
Four commercial high-rise layer houses were monitored for a year to determine manure production and nutrient concentration characteristics. Each house contained 80,400 to 124,500 mature Hy-Line W-36 birds. The solid manure collected as it accumulated beneath the cages for a year prior to being hauled out. The objective of the research was to accurately characterize the manure production to facilitate better nutrient planning. Manure volume and bulk density were measured and samples were collected monthly and analyzed for moisture, Kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonia, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and other chemical constituents. The measured manure production averaged 5.6 Mg (or 6.2 ton)·(1000 birds) –1 (year –1 on a dry basis. On a wet (as-is) basis the measured production was 9.52 Mg (or 10.5 ton)·(1000 birds) –1 (year –1 at 41% moisture. The measured manure N-P 2 O 5 -K 2 O contents were 18.5-41.0- 26.0 kg/Mg (37-82-52 lb/ton) on an “as-is” basis or 30.8-69.0-44.0 kg/Mg (62-138-88 lb/ton) on a dry basis. When manure production and nutrient concentrations were combined, measured nitrogen production was 52.8% less, phosphorus was 29.5% greater, and potassium was 27.8% greater, than the respective current Iowa estimates. The average calcium concentration for all four sites studied for the year was 10.0% (as-is basis). The manure handling system had a significant impact on manure characteristics. Scraper systems had a lower moisture content and a lower percentage of the nitrogen in ammonia form (29.8% moisture, NH 3 = 20% of TKN) than systems that dropped the manure into storage immediately (46.9% moisture, NH 3 = 30% TKN).
Comments
This is Journal Paper No. J-18136 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University, Project No. 3311. Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. Poultry and Egg Association.
This article is from Applied Engineering in Agriculture 15, no. 4 (1999): 337–340.