Kenaf Productivity and Morphology. When Grown in Iowa and in Kentucky. Poster Number Lenssen, Andrew Bourguignon, Marie Moore, Kenneth Lenssen, Andrew Bourguignon, Marie Archontoulis, Sotirios Goff, Ben Baldwin, Brian
dc.contributor.department Agronomy 2018-02-18T01:46:01.000 2020-06-29T23:02:02Z 2020-06-29T23:02:02Z Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2016 2016-11-23 2016-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Natural fibers are a promising alternative to synthetic fibers for reinforcing plastic or other composite materials, or fuel purposes. Kenaf (<em>Hibiscus cannabinus</em> L.), a fiber crop is grown to a limited extent in the U.S. predominantly in the Southern states. Producing kenaf in the Midwestern U.S. could provide a local source of these fibers for use in a number of manufactured products and potentially for use as a biofuel feedstock. The objectives of this study were to: 1) compare the productivity and the morphology of kenaf cultivars ‘Tainung 2’ and ‘Whitten’ when grown in Iowa and Kentucky and harvested after the first killing frost; 2) assess kenaf growth over the growing season; and 3) determine management (variety and seed density) effects on kenaf productivity and morphology. When grown in Kentucky in 2014, Tainung 2 yielded 24 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> whereas Whitten had a yield of 19 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>. In contrast, kenaf grown in Iowa showed a yield of 8 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>. In 2015, kenaf grown in Iowa and Kentucky had similar yield of 12.6 Mg ha-1 on average. When grown in Iowa, kenaf response to variety and seed density was more stable over time than in Kentucky. Therefore, a producer in Kentucky could influence kenaf productivity by changing management practices and variety. Tainung 2 was in general more sensitive to location and to seed density than Whitten. In 2015, Tainung 2 planted at a denser population produced 30% greater biomass than for Whitten and other seed densities. Whitten performed similarly across locations and seed densities. Growing Tainung 2 in Kentucky produced plants with 16% more core fiber than in Iowa, but using that same variety in Iowa would result in higher bast production. Overall, kenaf production is very feasible in Kentucky and Iowa but Kentucky has greater yield potential.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This is a poster from the ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, November 6–9, 2016. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/
dc.identifier.articleid 1020
dc.identifier.contextkey 9412919
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath agron_conf/17
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/|||Fri Jan 14 21:11:31 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural Science
dc.subject.disciplines Agronomy and Crop Sciences
dc.title Kenaf Productivity and Morphology. When Grown in Iowa and in Kentucky. Poster Number
dc.type article
dc.type.genre poster
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 7f67ca95-722b-4dfd-8f49-56ff95980240
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 3f505557-bcbb-4109-8675-d4edac9e025f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication fdd5c06c-bdbe-469c-a38e-51e664fece7a
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
817.05 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format