Peel resistance of adhesive joints with elastomer–carbon black composite as surface sensing membranes Zeng, Wei Sun, Weixing Bowler, Nicola Laflamme, Simon
dc.contributor.department Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
dc.contributor.department Electrical and Computer Engineering
dc.contributor.department Materials Science and Engineering 2018-02-20T17:48:29.000 2020-06-30T01:13:49Z 2020-06-30T01:13:49Z Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2015 2015-12-29 2015-04-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The peel resistance of four adhesives (“J-B Weld” by J-B Weld (adhesive A), 3 M Scotch-Weld DP 125 Gy (adhesive B), Loctite PL Premium (3x) Construction Adhesive (adhesive C), and Henkel Hysol EA9394 (adhesive D)) is investigated for their bonding performance of a styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene– carbon black (SEBS–CB) composite membrane used in structural health monitoring (SHM) applications. Tests are performed on membrane samples bonded on four common structural materials, namely aluminium, steel, concrete, and fiberglass, to obtain the peel resistance of adhesives. Results show that adhesive B has the highest strength for aluminium, steel, and fiberglass substrates, and that adhesive C has the highest strength for the concrete substrate. The performance is also evaluated versus adhesive cost, a critical variable in SHM applications. Here, adhesive C performed best for all substrates. Lastly, membrane residuals resulting from the peel tests are compared. Tests show that Adhesive B resulted in the highest residual percentage for aluminium, while adhesive C performed better for all other substrates. However, membrane residuals for adhesive C do not show a positive correlation with the peel resistance.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in the document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives; 58 (April 2015);28-33. Doi: <a href="" target="_blank">10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.01.001</a>.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/
dc.identifier.articleid 1076
dc.identifier.contextkey 7184656
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath ccee_pubs/82
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/|||Sat Jan 15 02:07:53 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.01.001
dc.subject.disciplines Civil Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Materials Science and Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Structural Materials
dc.subject.disciplines VLSI and Circuits, Embedded and Hardware Systems
dc.subject.keywords CNDE
dc.subject.keywords Peel (C)
dc.subject.keywords Peel strength
dc.subject.keywords SEBS-CB
dc.subject.keywords Sensor adhesive
dc.title Peel resistance of adhesive joints with elastomer–carbon black composite as surface sensing membranes
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication b6974335-cf51-4bf5-9758-28988104c1f2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 84547f08-8710-4934-b91e-ba5f46ab9abe
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 933e9c94-323c-4da9-9e8e-861692825f91
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a75a044c-d11e-44cd-af4f-dab1d83339ff
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication bf9f7e3e-25bd-44d3-b49c-ed98372dee5e
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
852.89 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format