Identifying Sources of Error in Surveys of Devils Hole Pupfish (Cyprinodon diabolis)

Date
2012-01-01
Authors
Dinsmore, Stephen
Dzul, Maria
Quist, Michael
Dinsmore, Stephen
Dixon, Philip
Dixon, Philip
Bower, Michael
Wilson, Kevin
Gaines, D. Bailey
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Statistics
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Series
Department
Natural Resource Ecology and ManagementStatistics
Abstract

We assessed four potential sources of error in estimating size of the population of Devils Hole pupfish (Cyprinodon diabolis): net, time of day, diver, and order of diver. Experimental dives (3/day) were conducted during 4 days in July 2009. Effects of the four sources of error on estimates from dive surveys were analyzed using a split-split plot ANOVA. Diver and order of diver had no significant influence on estimates, whereas the effect of presence or absence of a net was significant. Effects of time of day and presence or absence of a net showed a significant interaction with depth of water. Results indicated that pupfish may move upward during the dive, and as a result, the standard methods of dive surveys may underestimate abundance.

Comments

This is an article from The Southwestern Naturalist 57 (2012): 44, doi:10.1894/0038-4909-57.1.44. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Collections