Rethinking Agricultural Domestic Support under the World Trade Organization

dc.contributor.author Hart, Chad
dc.contributor.author Beghin, John
dc.contributor.department Economics
dc.contributor.department Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
dc.date 2018-02-18T01:04:48.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T02:06:13Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T02:06:13Z
dc.date.issued 2006-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>This paper focuses on the third pillar of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (URAA) of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the discipline of agricultural domestic support. The paper examines the current definition of agricultural domestic support used by the WTO, focusing on the Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) and other forms of support that are less to least distorting (Blue and Green Box payments). The analysis looks at the recent experience of four member states (the United States, the European Union, Japan, and Brazil). The structure of recent support varies considerably by country. Some countries, notably the United States, have strategically used the de minimis exemption to deflate their support figures substantially in order to remain within AMS limits, even though total support has exceeded these limits. The paper investigates the possible effects of changing the definition of the AMS so that it better reflects current support conditioned by market forces. If market prices (world and/or domestic) were to be used to compute current market support, a greater variability of the AMS would result, and violations of AMS limits would be more likely given the anticyclical nature of policies included in the AMS, especially for the United States and European Union.</p> <p>We also identify possible changes that would lead to more substantial trade reforms. In particular, we argue for phasing out the de minimis exemption and Blue Box support, adding a generous Green Box definition, which would allow countries to move quickly away from trade-distorting policies (Amber Box and the most trade-distorting Blue Box policies), followed by a phase-down of Green Box payments over time. The recent reforms of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) exemplify the spirit of the first part of the recommendation, while resistance to phase-down of Green Box payments may be overcome by a "reasonable" reduction schedule.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This is a briefing paper published as “Rethinking Agricultural Domestic Support under the World Trade Organization,” in Will Martin & Kym Anderson, eds. Agricultural Trade Reform & the Doha Development Agenda. Palgrave- Macmillan & the World Bank, 2006: 221-244.</p>
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/econ_las_pubs/318/
dc.identifier.articleid 1325
dc.identifier.contextkey 9366647
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath econ_las_pubs/318
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/21520
dc.source.uri http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=card_briefingpapers
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural and Resource Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Economic Policy
dc.subject.disciplines International Economics
dc.subject.keywords aggregate measure of support
dc.subject.keywords agricultural domestic support
dc.subject.keywords amber box
dc.subject.keywords AMS
dc.subject.keywords blue box
dc.subject.keywords Doha
dc.subject.keywords green box
dc.subject.keywords World Trade Organization
dc.subject.keywords WTO
dc.title Rethinking Agricultural Domestic Support under the World Trade Organization
dc.type article
dc.type.genre book_chapter
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4c5aa914-a84a-4951-ab5f-3f60f4b65b3d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 1a6be5f1-4f64-4e48-bb66-03bbcc25c76d
File
Collections