Iowa Experience with the Illinois N Test
Date
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract
An important aspect for estimating optimal N applications is to predict the soil N supply capacity (ability to supply plant-available N) each year. Since fertilizer applications supplement crop N requirements that the soil system cannot meet, understanding potential plant-available N originating from the soil can aid in setting N fertilization rates. General differences in plant-available N and fertilization need between fields are commonly accounted for through effects of crop rotation. An example of further refinement is the grouping of similar N responsive soils by yield potential (Vanotti and Bundy, 1994), as is done in Wisconsin for corn N fertilization. Determining soil N supply (N responsiveness) through soil testing has received considerable attention over the years. Most commonly used tests measure soil nitrate, either nitrate already present in the soil (post-harvest profile nitrate or preplant profile nitrate - PPNT) or a combination of nitrate present in the soil and that mineralized in the early spring (presidedress soil nitrate – PSNT or late spring soil nitrate – LSNT). For various reasons (time of sampling, sample depth, sampling difficulties, reliability) these tests have not been widely used in the north-central USA (Fox et al., 1999). Many other soil tests, based on various chemical extraction or biological incubation methods, have been studied over the years as potential indicators of mineralizable-N (examples in Bundy and Meisinger, 1994). However they have either not been successful in quantifying potential plant-available N or are not suitable for routine analysis.