Comparison of Flow and Transport Experiments on 3D Printed Micromodels with Direct Numerical Simulations

dc.contributor.author Watson, Francesca
dc.contributor.author Maes, Julien
dc.contributor.author Hasiuk, Franciszek
dc.contributor.author Geiger, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author Mackay, Eric
dc.contributor.author Singleton, Mike
dc.contributor.author McGravie, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Anouilh, Terry
dc.contributor.author Jobe, T. Dawn
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Shuo
dc.contributor.author Agar, Susan
dc.contributor.author Ishutov, Sergey
dc.contributor.author Hasiuk, Franciszek
dc.contributor.department Geological and Atmospheric Sciences
dc.date 2018-09-07T20:38:23.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T04:04:18Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T04:04:18Z
dc.date.copyright Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2018
dc.date.issued 2018-08-25
dc.description.abstract <p>Understanding pore-scale flow and transport processes is important for understanding flow and transport within rocks on a larger scale. Flow experiments on small-scale micromodels can be used to experimentally investigate pore-scale flow. Current manufacturing methods of micromodels are costly and time consuming. 3D printing is an alternative method for the production of micromodels. We have been able to visualise small-scale, single-phase flow and transport processes within a 3D printed micromodel using a custom-built visualisation cell. Results have been compared with the same experiments run on a micromodel with the same geometry made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA, also known as Perspex). Numerical simulations of the experiments indicate that differences in experimental results between the 3D printed micromodel and the Perspex micromodel may be due to variability in print geometry and surface properties between the samples. 3D printing technology looks promising as a micromodel manufacturing method; however, further work is needed to improve the accuracy and quality of 3D printed models in terms of geometry and surface roughness.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is published as Watson, Francesca, Julien Maes, Sebastian Geiger, Eric Mackay, Mike Singleton, Thomas McGravie, Terry Anouilh et al. "Comparison of Flow and Transport Experiments on 3D Printed Micromodels with Direct Numerical Simulations." <em>Transport in Porous Media</em> (2018). doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1136-9" target="_blank">10.1007/s11242-018-1136-9</a>.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/ge_at_pubs/257/
dc.identifier.articleid 1267
dc.identifier.contextkey 12757689
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath ge_at_pubs/257
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/38200
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/ge_at_pubs/257/2018_Hasiuk_ComparisonFlow.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 22:59:13 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1007/s11242-018-1136-9
dc.subject.disciplines Earth Sciences
dc.subject.disciplines Geology
dc.subject.keywords 3D printing
dc.subject.keywords Pore-scale flow
dc.subject.keywords Micromodels
dc.subject.keywords Imaging
dc.title Comparison of Flow and Transport Experiments on 3D Printed Micromodels with Direct Numerical Simulations
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ad837e95-a1e3-45c1-9f43-b51360be2762
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 29272786-4c4a-4d63-98d6-e7b6d6730c45
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
2018_Hasiuk_ComparisonFlow.pdf
Size:
4.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections