Eating disorder prevention: a comparison of intervention paradigms

dc.contributor.advisor Norman Scott
dc.contributor.author Green, Melinda
dc.contributor.department Psychology
dc.date 2018-08-24T21:08:50.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:13:22Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:13:22Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2003
dc.date.issued 2003-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The eating disorder prevention literature is replete with discrepant outcome findings regarding the efficacy of various prevention approaches. In addition, no single study has provided a direct empirical comparison evaluating the efficacy of two prevention approaches and a no-treatment control. The present experiment was to provide a direct empirical comparison of the efficacy of a dissonance-based approach, a psychoeducational/sociocultural approach, and a no-treatment control condition in the prevention of eating disorder attitudes and behaviors.;Two 3 (group: dissonance, psychoeducational/sociocultural, and control) x 2 (symptomatic status: symptomatic, asymptomatic) preliminary MANOVAS were conducted on the 6 postintervention and 5 follow-up measures. In addition, two 2 (group: dissonance, psychoeducational/sociocultural) x 2 (symptomatic status: symptomatic, asymptomatic) MANOVAS were conducted on postintervention and follow-up data to explore differences between the dissonance-based and psychoeducational/sociocultural conditions only. It was predicted that the dissonance-based intervention would be more effective than both the psychoeducational/sociocultural and no-treatment control conditions in reducing eating disorder attitudes and behaviors.;Findings indicated that the psychoeducational/sociocultural intervention was superior at postintervention at reducing dietary restraint for the symptomatic portion of the sample. It was also found that the dissonance based intervention was most effective for the symptomatic portion of the sample in reducing eating disorder behavior at postintervention. However, these results were not maintained at 4-week follow-up. Implications for eating disorder prevention paradigms are discussed.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/942/
dc.identifier.articleid 1941
dc.identifier.contextkey 6088666
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-8829
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/942
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/82517
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/942/r_3145642.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:33:00 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Clinical Psychology
dc.subject.keywords Psychology (Counseling psychology)
dc.subject.keywords Counseling psychology
dc.subject.keywords Psychology
dc.title Eating disorder prevention: a comparison of intervention paradigms
dc.type article
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 796236b3-85a0-4cde-b154-31da9e94ed42
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
r_3145642.pdf
Size:
2.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: