Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of Different Pretreatment and Product Separation Technologies for Cellulosic Butanol Production from Oil Palm Frond

dc.contributor.author Mahmud, Nazira
dc.contributor.author Rosentrater, Kurt
dc.contributor.author Rosentrater, Kurt
dc.contributor.department Food Science and Human Nutrition
dc.contributor.department Center for Crops Utilization Research
dc.contributor.department Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
dc.contributor.department Environmental Science
dc.contributor.department Sustainable Agriculture
dc.contributor.department Center for Bioplastics and Biocomposites
dc.contributor.department Center for Crops Utilization Research
dc.date 2020-01-10T18:21:44.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T22:36:54Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T22:36:54Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2020
dc.date.issued 2020-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Among the driving factors for the high production cost of cellulosic butanol lies the pretreatment and product separation sections, which often demand high amounts of energy, chemicals, and water. In this study, techno-economic analysis of several pretreatments and product separation technologies were conducted and compared. Among the pretreatment technologies evaluated, low-moisture anhydrous ammonia (LMAA) pretreatment has shown notable potential with a pretreatment cost of $0.16/L butanol. Other pretreatment technologies evaluated were autohydrolysis, soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), and soaking in sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH) with pretreatment costs of $1.98/L, $3.77/L, and $0.61/L, respectively. Evaluation of different product separation technologies for acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation process have shown that in situ stripping has the lowest separation cost, which was $0.21/L. Other product separation technologies tested were dual extraction, adsorption, and membrane pervaporation, with the separation costs of $0.38/L, $2.25/L, and $0.45/L, respectively. The evaluations have shown that production of cellulosic butanol using combined LMAA pretreatment and in situ stripping or with dual extraction recorded among the lowest butanol production cost. However, dual extraction model has a total solvent productivity of approximately 6% higher than those of in situ stripping model.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is published as Mahmud, Nazira, and Kurt A. Rosentrater. "Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of Different Pretreatment and Product Separation Technologies for Cellulosic Butanol Production from Oil Palm Frond." <em>Energies</em> 13, no. 1 (2020): 181. DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en13010181" target="_blank">10.3390/en13010181</a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/1103/
dc.identifier.articleid 2389
dc.identifier.contextkey 16172864
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_pubs/1103
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/805
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/1103/2020_RosentraterKurt_TechnoEconomicAnalysis_TEA_DifferentPretreatment.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 18:40:49 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.3390/en13010181
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Oil, Gas, and Energy
dc.subject.keywords ABE fermentation
dc.subject.keywords LMAA pretreatment
dc.subject.keywords techno-economic analysis
dc.subject.keywords cellulosic butanol
dc.title Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of Different Pretreatment and Product Separation Technologies for Cellulosic Butanol Production from Oil Palm Frond
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ae6468d9-2286-48ad-9293-5cfa893ea5f3
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4b6428c6-1fda-4a40-b375-456d49d2fb80
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ef0c8753-d288-4a4e-815f-fb800c343de8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2020_RosentraterKurt_TechnoEconomicAnalysis_TEA_DifferentPretreatment.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections