Achievement directed leadership

dc.contributor.author Gentile, Douglas
dc.contributor.department School of Education
dc.date 2018-08-16T09:25:30.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:07:32Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:07:32Z
dc.date.copyright Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1987
dc.date.issued 1987
dc.description.abstract <p>The purpose of this investigation was to develop and field-test a tutorial program designed to give classroom teachers the skills necessary to produce valid and effective classroom achievement tests. Information was gathered with regard to the general level of knowledge possessed by teachers and principals on the topic of classroom testing both before and after their participation in the tutorial program, and a determination was made as to whether their level of knowledge was a function of position, years of experience, grade level, or educational background. A secondary question studied the possible beneficial effect of providing the teachers and principals with background information on the topic of classroom testing prior to their participation in the tutorial program. A pretest-treatment-posttest design was employed and the statistical results were correlational in nature;The main portion of the data gathered were derived from a target group of 53 teachers and principals from the Mason City, Iowa area. Approximately one-third of the group was pretested two weeks prior to their attendance at the tutorial program and received background information at that time. The rest of the group was pretested just before the program. The entire target group received training in the fundamentals of classroom testing and was posttested at the conclusion of the program. Statistical analyses consisted of t-tests and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to answer the operational hypotheses. At that time an item score analysis was performed on the pretest and posttest results;The tutorial program was found to be effective in teaching the skills necessary for the valid and effective use of classroom achievement tests as indicated by significant gain scores obtained by the subjects. Furthermore, it was found that no prediction could be made about a subject's pretest score or posttest score based on that subject's position in the organization, years experience, grade level, or educational background. Providing background information to the subjects on the topic of classroom achievement testing prior to their attendance at the tutorial program yielded no measurable benefits.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8537/
dc.identifier.articleid 9536
dc.identifier.contextkey 6335297
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-12417
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/8537
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/81536
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8537/r_8716767.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:13:11 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Educational Administration and Supervision
dc.subject.keywords School management and organization
dc.subject.keywords Professional studies in education
dc.subject.keywords Education (Educational administration)
dc.title Achievement directed leadership
dc.type dissertation
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 385cf52e-6bde-4882-ae38-cd86c9b11fce
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
r_8716767.pdf
Size:
2.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: