Approaches for estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivities at various bulk densities with the extended Mualem-van Genuchten model

dc.contributor.author Tian, Zhengchao
dc.contributor.author Kool, Dilia
dc.contributor.author Horton, Robert
dc.contributor.author Ren, Tusheng
dc.contributor.author Horton, Robert
dc.contributor.author Heitman, Joshua
dc.contributor.department Agronomy
dc.date 2019-04-23T03:59:07.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T23:06:15Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T23:06:15Z
dc.date.copyright Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2019
dc.date.embargo 2020-03-14
dc.date.issued 2019-03-14
dc.description.abstract <p>The Mualem-van Genuchten model has been widely used for estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity (<em>K</em>u) from measured saturated hydraulic conductivity (<em>K</em>s) and fitted water retention curve (WRC) parameters. Soil bulk density (ρb) variations affect the accuracy of <em>K</em>u estimates. In this study, we extend the Mualem-van Genuchten model to account for the ρb effect with ρb-related WRC and <em>K</em>s models. We apply two functions (A and B) that relate the van Genuchten WRC model to ρb and two models (1 and 2) that estimate <em>K</em>s with various ρb. By combining the ρb-related WRC functions and <em>K</em>s models, we develop four integrated approaches (i.e., A1, A2, B1, and B2) for estimating <em>K</em>u at various ρb. <em>K</em>umeasurements made on five soils with various textures and ρb are used to evaluate the accuracy of the four approaches. The results show that all approaches produce reasonable <em>K</em>u estimates, with average root mean square errors (RMSEs) less than 0.35 (expressed in dimensionless unit because logarithmic <em>K</em>u values are used). Approach A2, with an average RMSE of 0.25, agrees better with <em>K</em>u measurements than does Approach A1 that has an average RMSE of 0.28. This is because Model 2 accounts for the WRC shape effect near saturation. Approaches A1 and A2 give more accurate <em>K</em>u estimates than do Approaches B1 and B2 which both have average RMSEs of 0.35, because Function A performs better in estimating WRCs than does Function B. The proposed approaches could be incorporated into simulation models for improved prediction of water, solute, and gas transport in soils.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This is a manuscript of an article published as Tian, Z., Kool, D., Ren, T., Horton, R., Heitman, J.L., Approaches for estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivities at various bulk densities with the extended Mualem-van Genuchten model, <em>Journal of Hydrology</em> (2019), doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.027" target="_blank" title="Persistent link using digital object identifier">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.027</a>.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs/570/
dc.identifier.articleid 1619
dc.identifier.contextkey 14070060
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath agron_pubs/570
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/4939
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs/570/2019_Horton_ApproachesEstimatingManuscript.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 00:59:18 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.027
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Hydrology
dc.subject.disciplines Soil Science
dc.subject.disciplines Statistical Models
dc.subject.keywords soil hydraulic conductivity
dc.subject.keywords water retention curve
dc.subject.keywords Mualem-van Genuchten model
dc.subject.keywords bulk density
dc.title Approaches for estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivities at various bulk densities with the extended Mualem-van Genuchten model
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d3fb0917-6868-417e-9695-a010896cfafa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication fdd5c06c-bdbe-469c-a38e-51e664fece7a
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2019_Horton_ApproachesEstimatingManuscript.pdf
Size:
1.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections