The use of formative assessments in traditional and hybrid lecture-labs of industrial engineering undergraduates and their motivational profiles

dc.contributor.advisor Paul J. Componation
dc.contributor.author Gidlewski, Sarah
dc.contributor.department Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering
dc.date 2018-08-11T16:14:01.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T02:52:25Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T02:52:25Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2014
dc.date.embargo 2001-01-01
dc.date.issued 2014-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p><strong>BACKGROUND <strong> Online learning is one way to increase the quality and accessibility of STEM higher education. Most previous research on online learning suffers from methodological deficiencies and doesn't focus on STEM undergraduates (Bowen, 2012).</p> <p><strong>PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS <strong> The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between the mode of viewing a lecture, participants' motivational profiles, the use of a formative assessment or not on a laboratory exercise, and participants' performance on the laboratory exercise and summative assessment.</p> <p><strong>DESIGN/METHOD <strong> Students in a freshman and sophomore industrial engineering class were randomly assigned to watch a lecture either live or online and then complete a hands-on laboratory exercise either with or without a formative assessment. All participants completed a demographics survey, Work Preference Inventory, and summative assessment.</p> <p><strong>RESULTS <strong> This study showed no difference among the summative assessment scores of participants in each of the four conditions. Four variables explained 33.7% of the variability in summative assessment scores: the participant's intrinsic subscale challenge score, whether the participant used a formative assessment or not, the quantity of unique observations on the laboratory exercise, and the participant's gender. Lastly, participants scored higher on the extrinsic major scale and subscales than participants in two other studies.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSIONS <strong> This study corrected methodological deficiencies found in other online learning research on Industrial Engineering undergraduates and found no difference in the learning outcomes of students who watched the lecture online as opposed to live. Participants also had a higher extrinsic major scale and subscales scores than those of samples of psychology students and management majors.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13827/
dc.identifier.articleid 4834
dc.identifier.contextkey 5777539
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-2641
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath etd/13827
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/28014
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13827/Gidlewski_iastate_0097M_14242.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 20:02:00 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Education
dc.subject.disciplines Engineering
dc.subject.keywords Formative assessment
dc.subject.keywords Industrial Engineering
dc.subject.keywords Online learning
dc.subject.keywords STEM higher education
dc.subject.keywords Work Preference Inventory
dc.title The use of formative assessments in traditional and hybrid lecture-labs of industrial engineering undergraduates and their motivational profiles
dc.type thesis
dc.type.genre thesis
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 51d8b1a0-5b93-4ee8-990a-a0e04d3501b1
thesis.degree.level thesis
thesis.degree.name Master of Science
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Gidlewski_iastate_0097M_14242.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: