Sampling guidelines for oral fluid-based surveys of group-housed animals

Date
2017-09-01
Authors
Rotolo, Marisa
Sun, Yaxuan
Wang, Chong
Wang, Chong
Gimenez-Lirola, Luis
Baum, David
Gauger, Phillip
Harmon, Karen
Hoogland, Marlin
Main, Rodger
Zimmerman, Jeffrey
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Wang, Chong
Person
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Series
Department
StatisticsVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine
Abstract

Formulas and software for calculating sample size for surveys based on individual animal samples are readily available. However, sample size formulas are not available for oral fluids and other aggregate samples that are increasingly used in production settings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop sampling guidelines for oral fluid-based porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) surveys in commercial swine farms. Oral fluid samples were collected in 9 weekly samplings from all pens in 3 barns on one production site beginning shortly after placement of weaned pigs. Samples (n = 972) were tested by real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-rtPCR) and the binary results analyzed using a piecewise exponential survival model for interval-censored, time-to-event data with misclassification. Thereafter, simulation studies were used to study the barn-level probability of PRRSV detection as a function of sample size, sample allocation (simple random sampling vs fixed spatial sampling), assay diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, and pen-level prevalence. These studies provided estimates of the probability of detection by sample size and within-barn prevalence. Detection using fixed spatial sampling was as good as, or better than, simple random sampling. Sampling multiple barns on a site increased the probability of detection with the number of barns sampled. These results are relevant to PRRSV control or elimination projects at the herd, regional, or national levels, but the results are also broadly applicable to contagious pathogens of swine for which oral fluid tests of equivalent performance are available.

Comments

This article is published as Rotolo, Marisa L., Yaxuan Sun, Chong Wang, Luis Giménez-Lirola, David H. Baum, Phillip C. Gauger, Karen M. Harmon, Marlin Hoogland, Rodger Main, and Jeffrey J. Zimmerman. "Sampling guidelines for oral fluid-based surveys of group-housed animals." Veterinary microbiology 209 (2017): 20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.004.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Collections