Comparison of ultrasound and carcass measures as predictors of ham composition

dc.contributor.author Hoge, Mark
dc.contributor.department Department of Animal Science
dc.date 2020-11-22T06:49:41.000
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-26T09:06:18Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-26T09:06:18Z
dc.date.copyright Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2000
dc.date.issued 2000-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The objective of this study was to compare ultrasound and carcass measures as predictors of ham composition. Data from six hundred twenty-four pigs representing 6 commercial genetic types in the Quality Lean Growth Modeling Project conducted by the National Pork Producers Council were used to develop live animal ultrasound and carcass measurement prediction equations for ham composition. The project included three replications, and four diet programs within each replication. Pigs were weighed and a cross-sectional 10th rib scan was taken bi- or tri-weekly until pigs reached one of three designated market points (114, 132, 150kg). Six body scans were taken on the market weight pigs on their right side within five days prior to slaughter. The images were captured with the ALOKA 500V (Corometrics Medical Systems, Wallingford, CT) real-time ultrasonic machine fitted with a 12.5 cm, 3.5 Mhz linear array transducer. There were three longitudinal scans at the 5th, 10th and last rib. The transducer was aligned horizontal to the spine, 5 cm off the dorsal mid-line. A 10th rib cross-sectional scan was taken perpendicular to the spine between the 9th and 10th rib. A ham scan was obtained with the probe being placed on the transverse plane on the outside of the ham approximately half the distance from the tail to the hock. Upon completion of the test, pigs were transported to Quality Processors packing plant in Austin, MN. Fat-O-Meter[Superscript TM] and carcass measurements for loin eye area, and fat measurements were also taken. The hams from the right side of the carcass were removed and sent to Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas for complete physical dissection. R2 ranged from .63 to .81 for the fixed effects models that predict the subcutaneous fat weight, outside ham muscle weight, total lean weight and total fat weight of the ham. The results from this study indicate that prediction equations with live ultrasound measurements are similar to the Fat-O-Meter[Superscript TM] and to actual carcass measurements in predicting components of ham composition.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/21270/
dc.identifier.articleid 22269
dc.identifier.contextkey 20252426
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-20201118-234
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/21270
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/98637
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/21270/Hoge_ISU_2000_H62.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 22:36:04 UTC 2022
dc.subject.keywords Animal science
dc.subject.keywords Animal breeding and genetics
dc.title Comparison of ultrasound and carcass measures as predictors of ham composition
dc.type thesis
dc.type.genre thesis
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 85ecce08-311a-441b-9c4d-ee2a3569506f
thesis.degree.discipline Animal Breeding and Genetics
thesis.degree.level thesis
thesis.degree.name Master of Science
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Hoge_ISU_2000_H62.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: