Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops Romeis, Jörg Hellmich, Richard Raybould, Alan Bigler, Franz Candolfi, Marco Hellmich, Richard Huesing, Joseph Shelton, Anthony
dc.contributor.department Entomology 2018-02-14T02:16:04.000 2020-06-30T02:25:20Z 2020-06-30T02:25:20Z 2014-07-03 2013-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Arthropods form a major part of the biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Many species are valued because they provide ecosystem services, including biological control, pollination and decomposition, or because they are of conservation interest. Some arthropods reduce crop yield and quality, and conventional chemical pesticides, biological control agents and genetically engineered (GE) crops are used to control them. A common concern addressed in the ecological risk assessment (ERA) that precedes regulatory approval of these pest control methods is their potential to adversely affect valued non-target arthropods (NTAs). A key concept of ERA is early-tier testing using worst-case exposure conditions in the laboratory and surrogate test species that are most likely to reveal an adverse effect. If no adverse effects are observed in those species at high exposures, confidence of negligible ecological risk from the use of the pest control method is increased. From experience with chemical pesticides and biological control agents, an approach is proposed for selecting test species for early-tier ERA of GE arthropod-resistant crops. Surrogate species should be selected that most closely meet three criteria: (i) <em>Potential sensitivity</em>: species should be the most likely to be sensitive to the arthropod-active compound based on the known spectrum of activity of the active ingredient, its mode of action, and the phylogenetic relatedness of the test and target species; (ii) <em>Relevance</em>: species should be representative of valued taxa or functional groups that are most likely to be exposed to the arthropod-active compound in the field; and (iii) <em>Availability and reliability</em>: suitable life-stages of the test species must be obtainable in sufficient quantity and quality, and validated test protocols must be available that allow consistent detection of adverse effects on ecologically relevant parameters. Our proposed approach ensures that the most suitable species are selected for testing and that the resulting data provide the most rigorous test of the risk hypothesis of no adverse effect in order to increase the quality and efficiency of ERAs for cultivation of GE crops.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is from <em>Chemosphere</em> 90 (2013): 901–909, doi:<a href="" target="_blank">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.035</a>.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/
dc.identifier.articleid 1058
dc.identifier.contextkey 5751055
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath ent_pubs/58
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/|||Sat Jan 15 01:00:49 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.035
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Entomology
dc.subject.disciplines Genetics
dc.subject.disciplines Plant Breeding and Genetics
dc.subject.keywords Bt crops
dc.subject.keywords Early-tier testing
dc.subject.keywords Ecological risk assessment
dc.subject.keywords Surrogate species
dc.subject.keywords Genetically modified crops
dc.subject.keywords Non-target arthropods
dc.title Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 3cca44d8-e1df-437d-a95a-d8e38963d2c1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication f47c8cad-50be-4fb0-8870-902ff536748c
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
261.9 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format