The theory and practice of green insurance: insurance to encourage the adoption of corn rootworm IPM

dc.contributor.advisor Bruce A. Babcock
dc.contributor.author Mitchell, Paul
dc.contributor.department Department of Economics (LAS)
dc.date 2018-08-23T07:34:17.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T07:18:43Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T07:18:43Z
dc.date.copyright Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1999
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.description.abstract <p>Best management practices exist that increase profit and improve the environmental performance of agriculture by increasing input use efficiency. Nevertheless, few producers adopt these best management practices. The risks involved with the adoption and use of these new best management practices are often thought to contribute to this low adoption rate. This dissertation theoretically and empirically analyzes the potential for best management practice insurance---green insurance---to provide insurance coverage against the failure of the practice, thus substantially reducing the risks involved with its adoption and use. Best management practice insurance removes, or at least reduces, a potentially significant factor hindering the adoption of the practice;A general model of stochastic production focused on optimal input use is developed to theoretically analyze the impact of best management practice insurance on producer incentives to adopt the practice and on optimal input use. Theoretical results are summarized in a series of propositions, but often the sign and magnitude of important effects are theoretically ambiguous, and empirical analysis is required;A stochastic dynamic corn rootworm population model is developed to empirically analyze corn rootworm integrated pest management (IPM). Monte Carlo simulations are used to evaluate the potential for IPM insurance to encourage producers to adopt corn rootworm IPM and reduce insecticide use. Depending on the plant day and location, for producers annually applying soil insecticides, corn rootworm IPM is worth on average 10 to 7.50 per acre, not including the cost of IPM scouting, and reduces insecticide application 75% to 95%. Depending on the plant day and location, actuarially fair IPM insurance requires a premium of 2.15 to 4.50 per acre and is worth 0.30 to 0.60 per acre to producers. Unfortunately, once the actuarially fair premium is increased to make the insurance feasible for private insurance companies to provide, producers are no longer willing to purchase the IPM insurance. This occurs because profit losses occurring when IPM fails are generally small, and thus the value to producers of the risk sharing benefits of IPM insurance is small.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12155/
dc.identifier.articleid 13154
dc.identifier.contextkey 6766885
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-13432
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/12155
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/65492
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12155/r_9940227.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 19:14:12 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural and Resource Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.keywords Economics
dc.subject.keywords Agricultural economics
dc.title The theory and practice of green insurance: insurance to encourage the adoption of corn rootworm IPM
dc.type dissertation
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4c5aa914-a84a-4951-ab5f-3f60f4b65b3d
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
r_9940227.pdf
Size:
4.82 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: