A comparative analysis of Iowa watershed organizations: Structure, function, and social infrastructure

dc.contributor.advisor Monica Haddad
dc.contributor.author Wagner, Andrea
dc.contributor.department Community and Regional Planning
dc.date 2021-06-11T00:49:50.000
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-14T06:35:14Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-14T06:35:14Z
dc.date.copyright Sat May 01 00:00:00 UTC 2021
dc.date.embargo 2021-04-21
dc.date.issued 2021-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>In 2013, Iowa released the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy (INRS) as a response to the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico, acknowledging the role that agriculturally dominant states play in water quality issues downstream. Prior to the release of the INRS, in 2010 the state of Iowa legislated the formation of Watershed Management Authorities (WMAs), which are voluntary, intergovernmental agreements that conduct local watershed planning within the HUC-8 scale. Both the INRS and WMAs are reliant on voluntary implementation of conservation practices to mitigate field runoff to reduce water quality and quantity issues. Such implementation can be difficult to achieve at the watershed scale. The study presented here uses the concept of social infrastructure to better understand the organizational structure and function relationship between five Iowa watershed organizations and the communities of which they are a part, with an aim to improve conservation implementation. Qualitative data was collected from five Iowa watershed organizations—three WMAs and two farmer-led groups—through stakeholder interviews and content analysis of organizational documents. This data formed the basis for the creation of two concept maps of social infrastructure as it exists in the WMAs and farmer-led groups. Analysis of the data reveals important differences between the social infrastructure of WMAs and farmer-led groups, particularly in regard to how the watershed’s scale can impact communication and funding needs. Analysis also opens up questions regarding the current structure of WMAs, as well as how watershed plans in general can be more fully integrated with community and economic development in order to advance their goals. Though the INRS and the legislation of WMAs are foundational to improving water quality and quantity issues in Iowa, the research here demonstrates that the watershed organizations’ social infrastructure can be more effectively used and developed.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/18633/
dc.identifier.articleid 9640
dc.identifier.contextkey 23294013
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-20210609-194
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath etd/18633
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/VrO5Qqlw
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/18633/Wagner_iastate_0097M_19464.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 21:45:02 UTC 2022
dc.subject.keywords Community Planning
dc.subject.keywords Social Infrastructure
dc.subject.keywords Watershed Planning
dc.title A comparative analysis of Iowa watershed organizations: Structure, function, and social infrastructure
dc.type article
dc.type.genre thesis
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 89cad1dd-0d07-4067-a961-fe0e798c691f
thesis.degree.discipline Community and Regional Planning and Sustainable Agriculture
thesis.degree.level thesis
thesis.degree.name Master of Community and Regional Planning
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Wagner_iastate_0097M_19464.pdf
Size:
2.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: