The application of machine learning algorithms in predicting soil organic carbon/matter
dc.contributor.advisor | Bradley A Miller | |
dc.contributor.author | Khaledian, Yones | |
dc.contributor.department | Agronomy | |
dc.date | 2020-06-26T20:03:31.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-30T03:22:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-30T03:22:33Z | |
dc.date.copyright | Fri May 01 00:00:00 UTC 2020 | |
dc.date.embargo | 2022-06-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Digital soil mapping (DSM) increasingly makes use of machine learning algorithms to identify relationships between soil properties and multiple covariates that can be detected across landscapes. Selecting the appropriate algorithm for model building is critical for optimizing results in the context of the available data. Over the past decade, many studies have tested different machine learning (ML) approaches on a variety of soil data sets. Here, we review the application of some of the most popular ML algorithms for digital soil mapping. Specifically, we compare the strengths and weaknesses of multiple linear regression (MLR), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector regression (SVR), Cubist, random forest (RF), and artificial neural networks (ANN) for DSM. These algorithms were compared on the basis of five factors: 1) quantity of hyperparameters, 2) sample size, 3) covariate selection, 4) learning time, and 5) interpretability of the resulting model. If training time is a limitation, then algorithms that have fewer model parameters and hyperparameters should be considered, e.g., MLR, KNN, SVR, and Cubist. If the data set is large (thousands of samples) and computation time is not an issue, ANN would likely produce the best results. If the data set is small (</p> | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier | archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/18024/ | |
dc.identifier.articleid | 9031 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 18242673 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-20200624-203 | |
dc.identifier.s3bucket | isulib-bepress-aws-west | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | etd/18024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/32207 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.source.bitstream | archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/18024/Khaledian_iastate_0097E_18816.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 21:35:43 UTC 2022 | |
dc.subject.keywords | Digital Soil Mapping | |
dc.subject.keywords | Machine Learning | |
dc.subject.keywords | Optimized Sampling Design | |
dc.subject.keywords | Soil Organic Matter | |
dc.title | The application of machine learning algorithms in predicting soil organic carbon/matter | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.type.genre | thesis | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | fdd5c06c-bdbe-469c-a38e-51e664fece7a | |
thesis.degree.discipline | Soil Science (Soil Morphology and Genesis) | |
thesis.degree.level | thesis | |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy |
File
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Khaledian_iastate_0097E_18816.pdf
- Size:
- 2.99 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: