Evaluation of selection indices in a recurrent selection program in corn (Zea mays L.)

Thumbnail Image
Date
1989
Authors
Milla, Julio
Major Professor
Advisor
K. R. Lamkey
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Agronomy

The Department of Agronomy seeks to teach the study of the farm-field, its crops, and its science and management. It originally consisted of three sub-departments to do this: Soils, Farm-Crops, and Agricultural Engineering (which became its own department in 1907). Today, the department teaches crop sciences and breeding, soil sciences, meteorology, agroecology, and biotechnology.

History
The Department of Agronomy was formed in 1902. From 1917 to 1935 it was known as the Department of Farm Crops and Soils.

Dates of Existence
1902–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Farm Crops and Soils (1917–1935)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract

Index selection is a procedure used for selecting more than one trait at a time in a breeding program. Several types of selection indices have been proposed. The first one formally introduced and probably the most widely known is the Smith-Hazel index which requires estimates of phenotypic and genotypic parameters for its calculation. These estimates are subject to sampling errors that affect the performance of the index. In this study, several selection indices were compared, and the effectiveness of pooling parameter estimates over several cycles of selection on the estimation of the Smith-Hazel index was evaluated for the simultaneous improvement of grain yield, grain moisture, root lodging and stalk lodging in corn;The degree of improvement for each of the traits was influenced by the structure of the correlations between traits. Some indices were more affected than others by these changes in correlation structure. The indices least affected were the base using the inverse of the phenotypic standard deviation, the multiplicative and the rank summation resulting in a more even improvement for the four traits considered;The efficiency of Smith-Hazel indices calculated by pooling parameter estimates over several cycles of selection were compared with indices calculated using the parameter estimates obtained from data of the specific cycle of selection. They were evaluated based on the selection differentials and predicted gains obtained for each of the four traits considered, and predicted gain in the aggregate genotype. In general, the Smith-Hazel selection indices calculated by pooling parameter estimates were neither better for improving the four traits simultaneously nor for improving the aggregate genotype than the selection indices calculated with data of the specific cycle of selection.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1989