The impacts of policy alternatives and foreign demand fluctuations on the US rice market

Thumbnail Image
Date
1989
Authors
Jeon, Jong-Pyeong
Major Professor
Advisor
Stanley R. Johnson
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Economics

The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 to teach economic theory as a truth of industrial life, and was very much concerned with applying economics to business and industry, particularly agriculture. Between 1910 and 1967 it showed the growing influence of other social studies, such as sociology, history, and political science. Today it encompasses the majors of Agricultural Business (preparing for agricultural finance and management), Business Economics, and Economics (for advanced studies in business or economics or for careers in financing, management, insurance, etc).

History
The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 under the Division of Industrial Science (later College of Liberal Arts and Sciences); it became co-directed by the Division of Agriculture in 1919. In 1910 it became the Department of Economics and Political Science. In 1913 it became the Department of Applied Economics and Social Science; in 1924 it became the Department of Economics, History, and Sociology; in 1931 it became the Department of Economics and Sociology. In 1967 it became the Department of Economics, and in 2007 it became co-directed by the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Liberal Arts and Sciences, and Business.

Dates of Existence
1898–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Economic Science (1898–1910)
  • Department of Economics and Political Science (1910-1913)
  • Department of Applied Economics and Social Science (1913–1924)
  • Department of Economics, History and Sociology (1924–1931)
  • Department of Economics and Sociology (1931–1967)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract

U.S. Government commodity programs have both direct and indirect effects on farmers, consumers, and taxpayers, and play a leading role in the U.S. agriculture. By some measures announced by U.S. Congress, agriculture receives more federal support relative to importance than any other sector of the economy. Specially, the U.S. rice industry is mostly influenced by the government policy because the rice industry is smaller than other grain industries;Export-oriented policies of Thailand can have dramatic consequences on the U.S. rice industry. Thailand, as the largest exporter and competitor against the U.S., has contributed to price and export variability in the U.S. rice market as well as in the world market;Furthermore, small swings in foreign demand for world rice market are important to analyze the U.S. rice industry because the U.S. rice industry heavily depends upon the world rice market, with more than 60 percent of national rice production as an outlet for exports;Under a Stackelberg duopoly assumption, Thailand as a price-leader and U.S. as a price-follower, an economic supply-demand model that represents economic forces acting in the U.S. rice industry was formulated. Then the effects of alternative policies of U.S. and Thailand, and world demand fluctuations of U.S. rice economy were examined by using this economic framework;Empirical study for 1960-1985 shows that an aggressive export policy of Thailand, an expansionary total production policy of major importers, and market-oriented policy of U.S. Government, might seem to hurt the rice farmers because of the lower farm price and supply, and hence loss of expected returns to rice farmers. Simulation result also shows that the Thailand export policy has much more significant impacts on the U.S. rice market than the U.S. support price policy and the expansionary production policy of major importing countries.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Subject Categories
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1989