Hybrid-flipped classrooms – challenges and opportunities (WIP)

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author Raman, D.
dc.contributor.author Raman, D. Raj
dc.contributor.author Kaleita, Amy
dc.contributor.author Kaleita, Amy
dc.contributor.department Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
dc.contributor.department Center for Biorenewable Chemicals
dc.date 2021-07-01T22:44:42.000
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-14T00:12:57Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-14T00:12:57Z
dc.date.copyright Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2018
dc.date.embargo 2017-01-01
dc.date.issued 2018-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>In the 2013-14 academic year, we embarked on an effort to flip two engineering courses in our department – a year-1 problem solving and programming course (Y1PS), and a year-3 numerical methods course (Y3NM). Initially, the Y3NM course, which we were also teaching for the first time and revising significantly as we did, was conducted in a standard flipped model wherein students viewed video lectures and took diagnostic quizzes prior to attending class, and where class time itself focused on discussion and problem solving. In contrast, based on our significant prior experiences teaching the Y1PS course, and upon its organization as a mixed-mode lecture/problems solving course, we did not take a standard flipped approach to it. Instead, in the Y1PS course, students watched videos during the class periods themselves; such a structure was facilitated by the classroom having one computer per student, to accommodate the programming portion of the class. We refer to this “watch in class” model as a hybrid-flipped classroom, and have found this approach to work significantly better in terms of student engagement and learning than the standard flipped model did for us. With that experience, we modified the Y3NM class to the hybrid-flipped model in subsequent offerings. We recognize that the hybrid-flipped model is resource intensive because it requires far more classroom technology than traditional lecture, and also that our positive results are in part due to the computer-intensive nature of both courses in which we have implemented this model. We report here about our experiences, both positive and negative, with flipped and hybrid-flipped approaches, and provide guidance for instructors considering such changes themselves.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This proceeding is published as Raman, D. Raj, and Amy L. Kaleita. "Work in Progress: Hybrid-flipped Classrooms: Challenges and Opportunities." Paper ID #23175. In <em>2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition</em>. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--31289" target="_blank">10.18260/1-2--31289</a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_conf/614/
dc.identifier.articleid 1614
dc.identifier.contextkey 23627764
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_conf/614
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/ywAbaZYv
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_conf/614/2018_KaleitaAmy_HybridFlipped.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 01:17:01 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.18260/1-2--31289
dc.subject.disciplines Engineering Education
dc.title Hybrid-flipped classrooms – challenges and opportunities (WIP)
dc.type article
dc.type.genre conference
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0d20027b-c384-4033-aafe-d7cf62e10240
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 8a405b08-e1c8-4a10-b458-2f5a82fcf148
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
2018_KaleitaAmy_HybridFlipped.pdf
Size:
256.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Conference Proceedings and Presentations