Statistical analysis of foreign exchange rates: application of cointegration model and regime-switching stochastic volatility model

Thumbnail Image
Date
1997
Authors
Kondo, Koji
Major Professor
Advisor
Stefano Athanasoulis
F. Jay Breidt
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Economics

The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 to teach economic theory as a truth of industrial life, and was very much concerned with applying economics to business and industry, particularly agriculture. Between 1910 and 1967 it showed the growing influence of other social studies, such as sociology, history, and political science. Today it encompasses the majors of Agricultural Business (preparing for agricultural finance and management), Business Economics, and Economics (for advanced studies in business or economics or for careers in financing, management, insurance, etc).

History
The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 under the Division of Industrial Science (later College of Liberal Arts and Sciences); it became co-directed by the Division of Agriculture in 1919. In 1910 it became the Department of Economics and Political Science. In 1913 it became the Department of Applied Economics and Social Science; in 1924 it became the Department of Economics, History, and Sociology; in 1931 it became the Department of Economics and Sociology. In 1967 it became the Department of Economics, and in 2007 it became co-directed by the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Liberal Arts and Sciences, and Business.

Dates of Existence
1898–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Economic Science (1898–1910)
  • Department of Economics and Political Science (1910-1913)
  • Department of Applied Economics and Social Science (1913–1924)
  • Department of Economics, History and Sociology (1924–1931)
  • Department of Economics and Sociology (1931–1967)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract

The dissertation discusses an application of two statistical models to foreign exchange rate data and consists of two main parts. The first part is an application of the partial cointegration model developed by Johansen (1990) and uses the concept of weak exogeneity. While a direct application of the cointegration approach with many variables is not easy to handle, the partial model can reduce the number of the parameters to be estimated by identifying weakly exogenous variables. The method is illustrated utilizing a theoretical long-run model based on Dornbusch's sticky price model. The small country assumption is relaxed to that both countries are taken to be large. Furthermore the model is also extended to include a third country. The data set consists of monthly exchange rates, countries' money supplies, and GNPs. The three countries are Germany, Japan and the United States, thus giving a total of eight equations to be estimated. Three variables out of eight are identified as weakly exogenous variables and only five questions are estimated. Results show that there exist three cointegrating relations among the variables. One relation can be interpreted as long-run money market equilibrium while the other two relations, though considered to be long-run in nature, can not be interpreted in an economically meaningful way. Variance decomposition and impulse response analysis are conducted to investigate the dynamic of the system;In the second part of the dissertation a regime-switching stochastic volatility (RSV) model is applied to daily exchange rate data. The model is used to capture possible changing volatility of the exchange rate over time. The RSV model recommends itself since it is the more natural method to apply, as opposed to using ARCH and GARCH models. The main drawback however, is that it is the more complicated to implement. A Markov chain technique is used as an estimation method. By imposing interest rate parity, the relationship between exchange rate and foreign and domestic interest rate difference is also simultaneously examined. The results indicate that interest rate difference does not affect the level and the volatility of exchange rates. This finding supports the random walk theory of exchange rates. On the other hand two different regimes, a high-volatility regime and a low-volatility regime, are discovered and well modeled. The development of a forecasting model will be the subject for future studies.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1997