Predicting public approval of Supreme Court nominees: examining factors influencing mass public opinion of stealth nominees in the post-Bork era

dc.contributor.advisor Mack C. Shelley
dc.contributor.advisor Dirk Deam
dc.contributor.author Kelly, Daniel
dc.contributor.department Political Science
dc.date 2018-08-11T11:27:00.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T02:38:43Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T02:38:43Z
dc.date.copyright Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2010
dc.date.embargo 2013-06-05
dc.date.issued 2010-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Conventional wisdom asserts that the American public is ignorant of the Supreme Court and thus, the opinions of average citizens are irrelevant, both in the confirmation debates regarding nominees to the Supreme Court and as a tool of political mobilization. In light of the Seventeenth Amendment's direct election of the Senate and the Senate's advice and consent role, mass public opinion is relevant regardless of the sophistication of their input. Moreover, mobilization of mass public approval or disapproval of nominees is a factor influencing the strategies of partisan politics in general.</p> <p>It is clear that the public is aware of Supreme Court nominees and they evaluate the nominees on two different bases. First, the public evaluates nominees based on an ideological model to the extent of the information the public possesses about the ideology of nominees. Second, the public assesses nominees on the basis of judicial qualification and suitability for the position of Supreme Court justice, what Gibson and Caldeira refer to as "Judiciousness." This two part evaluation mirrors part of Abrahams' model of executive decision making for Supreme Court nominations.</p> <p>Given that stealth nominees, herein defined as nominees with limited judicial records, by their nature provide little insight into their ideological beliefs, they do not provoke significant disapproval among the mass public on that basis. Provided they meet some minimum standard of judiciousness, approval of stealth nominees is not negatively affected by the lack of knowledge about the nominee's ideology. Thus, in the cases examined herein presidents were able through the nomination of stealth candidates to avoid public disapproval their nominees to the Court.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11864/
dc.identifier.articleid 2878
dc.identifier.contextkey 2808076
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-654
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath etd/11864
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/26070
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11864/Kelly_iastate_0097M_11645.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 18:59:58 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Political Science
dc.title Predicting public approval of Supreme Court nominees: examining factors influencing mass public opinion of stealth nominees in the post-Bork era
dc.type article
dc.type.genre thesis
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a4a018a7-4afa-4663-ba11-f2828cbd0a15
thesis.degree.level thesis
thesis.degree.name Master of Arts
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Kelly_iastate_0097M_11645.pdf
Size:
199.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: