Do they want to know?: analysis of the decision for presymptomatic testing

dc.contributor.advisor Frederick Borgen
dc.contributor.author Johnson, Donald
dc.contributor.department Psychology
dc.date 2018-08-16T02:09:28.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:14:35Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:14:35Z
dc.date.copyright Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1991
dc.date.issued 1991
dc.description.abstract <p>This study examined the decision-making process involved when individuals consider being tested presymptomatically for two different diseases, Huntington's disease and HIV infection (including the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome). Each disease has a long latency period between contracting the disease and developing obvious symptoms. Both illnesses follow a debilitating, catastrophic path often involving neurological and cognitive deterioration. No successful cure currently exists for either disease. Recent advances in medical diagnostic technology have presented patients with the opportunity to know if they will develop these illnesses. Positive test results may be devastating while no successful cure for the diagnosed disease is currently available. The circumstances under which an individual will choose to be tested for such an illness are examined in this study. Policy capturing techniques (PCT) were used to determine the contribution of the independent variables by covarying the five dichotomous variables to create 32 hypothetical diagnostic testing situations to assess the individual decision processes of 217 undergraduate subjects. These five independent variables were: transmission mechanism, health status of the subject, partner/parent carrier status, physician test recommendation, and reproductive plans. Results indicate significant main effects for each of the five factors for the whole group. The five variables combined to account for more than 65% of the variance in the diagnostic decisional choices from the hypothetical scenarios. Cluster analysis was performed on the individual patterns of beta weights to determine if there were groups of subjects with similar decisions strategies. Seven clusters were found to represent different decisional patterns. Subject variables were of some use in describing the membership of each cluster. History of previous serious illness, plans for diagnostic testing, native language, and income were found to predict cluster membership and hence decision strategy. The implications of inadequate descriptors for the clusters and possible limitations in PCT are discussed.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/9614/
dc.identifier.articleid 10613
dc.identifier.contextkey 6360745
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-9262
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/9614
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/82732
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/9614/r_9207249.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:35:40 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Psychology
dc.subject.keywords Psychology
dc.title Do they want to know?: analysis of the decision for presymptomatic testing
dc.type article
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 796236b3-85a0-4cde-b154-31da9e94ed42
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
r_9207249.pdf
Size:
2.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: