Impairing Existing Declarative Memory in Humans by Disrupting Reconsolidation

Thumbnail Image
Date
2013-04-01
Authors
Chan, Jason
LaPaglia, Jessica
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Psychology
Abstract

During the past decade, a large body of research has shown that memory traces can become labile upon retrieval and must be restabilized. Critically, interrupting this reconsolidation process can abolish a previously stable memory. Although a large number of studies have demonstrated this reconsolidation associated amnesia in nonhuman animals, the evidence for its occurrence in humans is far less compelling, especially with regard to declarative memory. In fact, reactivating a declarative memory often makes it more robust and less susceptible to subsequent disruptions. Here we show that existing declarative memories can be selectively impaired by using a noninvasive retrieval–relearning technique. In six experiments, we show that this reconsolidation-associated amnesia can be achieved 48 h after formation of the original memory, but only if relearning occurred soon after retrieval. Furthermore, the amnesic effect persists for at least 24 h, cannot be attributed solely to source confusion and is attainable only when relearning targets specific existing memories for impairment. These results demonstrate that human declarative memory can be selectively rewritten during reconsolidation.

Comments

This is a manuscript of an article from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (2013): 9309, doi:10.1073/pnas.1218472110. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Subject Categories
Copyright
Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2013
Collections