Use of the Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Technique to Monitor Soil Water Content in the Vadose Zone

dc.contributor.author Ochsner, Tyson
dc.contributor.author Horton, Robert
dc.contributor.author Horton, Robert
dc.contributor.author Ren, Tusheng
dc.contributor.department Agronomy
dc.date 2018-01-24T20:21:18.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T23:04:38Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T23:04:38Z
dc.date.issued 2003-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) technique is emerging as a useful technique for measuring soil volumetric water content (θ). However, few published data are available regarding the performance of the DPHP technique under field conditions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the DPHP technique for measuring θ under field conditions. We used 24 DPHP sensors to monitor θ in a soybean [<em>Glycine max</em> (L.) Merr.] field during the 2001 and 2002 growing seasons. The DPHP sensors demonstrated durability in field conditions and clear sensitivity to temporal and spatial variations of θ at the scale of measurement. The mean θ measured by the DPHP sensors (θ<sub>DPHP</sub>) was on average 0.040 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> larger than the mean θ measured by soil sampling (θ<sub>SS</sub>). The response of the DPHP sensors was linear. Regressions of θ<sub>DPHP</sub> vs. θ<sub>SS</sub> yielded <em>r</em> <sup>2</sup> values of 0.949 and 0.843 at depths of 7.5 and 37.5 cm. The DPHP technique showed good resolution with RMSE values for the regression of 0.009 and 0.011 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> at the two measurement depths. The slopes of the regressions were 0.75 rather than 1.0. Errors in θ<sub>SS</sub> are a likely cause of this low slope. We shifted all the θ values for each sensor up or down by a constant value to make the first θ measurement from each sensor equal θ determined from soil sampling near that sensor at the time of installation. This simple matching point procedure improved the accuracy of the DPHP technique, resulting in a −0.024 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> average difference between θ<sub>DPHP</sub> and θ<sub>SS</sub> Also, the matching point procedure markedly reduced the variability between sensors, reducing the average SD from 0.063 to 0.026 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> This procedure requires no additional soil sampling and is recommended for field applications of the DPHP technique.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is published as Ochsner, Tyson E., Robert Horton, and Tusheng Ren. "Use of the dual-probe heat-pulse technique to monitor soil water content in the vadose zone." Vadose Zone Journal 2, no. 4 (2003): 572-579. doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2136" target="_blank">10.2136/vzj2003.5720</a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs/366/
dc.identifier.articleid 1368
dc.identifier.contextkey 11389542
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath agron_pubs/366
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/4716
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs/366/2003_Horton_UseDual.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 23:48:15 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.2136/vzj2003.5720
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural Science
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Soil Science
dc.title Use of the Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Technique to Monitor Soil Water Content in the Vadose Zone
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d3fb0917-6868-417e-9695-a010896cfafa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication fdd5c06c-bdbe-469c-a38e-51e664fece7a
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2003_Horton_UseDual.pdf
Size:
140.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections