What is the efficacy of viral and bacterial vaccines in feedlot cattle to reduce bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and subsequent antibiotic use?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author O'Connor, Annette
dc.contributor.author O'Connor, Annette
dc.contributor.author Wang, Chong
dc.contributor.author Wang, Chong
dc.contributor.author Sargeant, Jan
dc.contributor.author White, Brad
dc.contributor.author Larson, Robert
dc.contributor.author Wang, Bing
dc.contributor.author Waldner, Cheryl
dc.contributor.author Wood, Hannah
dc.contributor.author Glanville, Julie
dc.contributor.department Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine
dc.date 2018-07-03T12:46:35.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-07T05:13:50Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-07T05:13:50Z
dc.date.copyright Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2018
dc.date.embargo 2018-07-02
dc.date.issued 2018-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Bovine respiratory disease complex is the most economically significant disease of feedlot cattle[4]. Putative causal organisms include Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni and Mycoplasma bovis, bovine herpesvirus, bovine viral diarrhea virus, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, and parainfluenza type 3 virus[5].</p> <p>Vaccination against the putative causal organisms is a frequently used approach to aid in the prevention of BRD. With a more significant concern for prudent antibiotic use in the beef industry, it is vital that decision making with regards BRDC management be based on an understanding of the efficacy of vaccination programs and management factors that might modify the efficacy of the preventive management practice[6, 7]. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials yield the highest level of evidence for the efficacy of treatment under field conditions, and comparative efficacy can be examined using network meta-analysis for multiple comparisons. Establishing the efficacy of monovalent and polyvalent vaccinations for the prevention of BRDC in feedlot cattle will serve to improve decision makers’ ability to engage in effective stewardship of antibiotics.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/vdpam_reports/11/
dc.identifier.articleid 1010
dc.identifier.contextkey 12425438
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath vdpam_reports/11
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/92133
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/vdpam_reports/11/2018_OConnor_Protocol_WhatEfficacy.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 18:38:57 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Large or Food Animal and Equine Medicine
dc.subject.disciplines Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public Health
dc.subject.disciplines Veterinary Toxicology and Pharmacology
dc.title What is the efficacy of viral and bacterial vaccines in feedlot cattle to reduce bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and subsequent antibiotic use?
dc.type article
dc.type.genre report
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication bbd2db96-9105-4b96-8f96-713be18a75ac
relation.isAuthorOfPublication b715071c-c3bd-419c-b021-0ac4702f346a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 5ab07352-4171-4f53-bbd7-ac5d616f7aa8
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
2018_OConnor_Protocol_WhatEfficacy.pdf
Size:
306.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Publications