Seroprevalence of Brucella Spp., Lepstospira Spp and Toxoplasma Gondii in wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Southern Brazil

dc.contributor.author Trevisol, Iara
dc.contributor.author Kramer, Beatris
dc.contributor.author Coldebella, Arlei
dc.contributor.author Santiago Silva, Virginia
dc.date 2018-08-13T18:52:01.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:23:59Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:23:59Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017
dc.date.issued 2017-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The wild boar (Sus scrofa), exotic invasive specie, is currently distributed in many Brazilian states, including Santa Catarina (SC) and Rio Grande do Sul (RS). Since the wild pigs are susceptible to zoonotic pathogens as Leptospira spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Brucella spp, their large populations, movements and dispersion can spread diseases, being a potential transmission source to humans, livestock and other sylvatic sympatric species. Despite its importance are there few information about sanitary status of this wild populations and their impact for human and livestock health in Brazil. Objective this work was to investigate the presence of antibodies to Brucella spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Leptospira spp in blood samples of wild boar legally hunted for population control in SC and RS states. From January 2014 to July 2016, 193 samples were tested to antibodies against Brucella spp (buffered acidified plate agglutination test-BAPA) and Leptospira spp (micro agglutination test-MAT). Of these 193, 149 were tested to Toxoplasma gondii antibodies (HAI test). Overall, serological results showed negativity to Brucella spp and low prevalence for Toxoplasma gondii (2,7%). On the other hand, the seroprevalence of Leptospira spp was 6,74% with significantly greater percentage of positivity in RS (12,5%) compared to SC (3,88%). The most prevalent serovars ware Icterohaemorragiae and Pomona, with titers ranging from 1:400 to 1:12,800 in RS. Icterohaemorragiae was the most prevalent serovar in SC but with lowest titres. Seroprevalence of these pathogens in wild population indicate the environmental health, including sympatric livestock and wildlife. Ecological factors should be considered to understand the role of wild boars in the cycle of these diseases. Our results indicate that hunters and consumers of wild boar meat of must be aware about zoonotic risk in carcass handling and meat intake.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/safepork/2017/allpapers/9/
dc.identifier.articleid 2286
dc.identifier.contextkey 10717509
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/safepork-180809-346
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath safepork/2017/allpapers/9
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/84387
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/safepork/2017/allpapers/9/09_114_VIRGINIA_SANTIAGO_SILVA.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:24:42 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Animal Diseases
dc.subject.disciplines Animal Sciences
dc.subject.disciplines Large or Food Animal and Equine Medicine
dc.title Seroprevalence of Brucella Spp., Lepstospira Spp and Toxoplasma Gondii in wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Southern Brazil
dc.type event
dc.type.genre event
dspace.entity.type Publication
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
09_114_VIRGINIA_SANTIAGO_SILVA.pdf
Size:
213.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: