The relationship of self-ratings to assessor ratings of assessment center performance

dc.contributor.advisor Frederick G. Brown
dc.contributor.advisor Donald H. Schuster
dc.contributor.author Maciejczyk, Maria
dc.contributor.department Psychology
dc.date 2018-08-15T15:56:58.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T07:01:39Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T07:01:39Z
dc.date.copyright Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1991
dc.date.issued 1991
dc.description.abstract <p>This study investigated the relationships between self and assessor ratings of management dimensions (e.g. communication skills, interpersonal skills, problem solving skills) measured by two assessment centers, overall ratings of managerial potential, and background variables including demographics, work experience and cognitive abilities. Subjects were 179 candidates from an advanced management assessment program and 156 candidates from a middle management assessment program. For each assessment center candidate, self-ratings and assessor ratings of management dimensions were obtained as well as the overall assessment rating and background information (age, sex, race, education level, education major, years since degree, employment with the company, years of service, number of subordinates, line/staff employment, and verbal and mathematical ability measures);The relationships between assessor and self-ratings were investigated through correlations, comparison of means and standard deviations, and factor analyses. Relationships of assessment ratings to background variables were investigated through correlations and analyses of variance. The relationships of background variables and assessment dimensions to the overall assessment ratings were analyzed through regressions;Results revealed that self and assessor ratings of management dimensions were widely different, with significantly different means and low correlations. Self-ratings were more lenient and displayed less halo than assessor ratings. Assessor ratings were negatively related to age, and positively related to education level and cognitive abilities, whereas self-ratings showed limited relationships with these variables. Assessor ratings of dimensions showed a strong relationship to the overall assessment ratings, a relationship that was not affected significantly by self-ratings or background variables. Self-ratings were not strongly related to the overall assessment ratings. Implications of these findings and limitations of the study are discussed.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10055/
dc.identifier.articleid 11054
dc.identifier.contextkey 6385019
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-9506
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/10055
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/63159
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10055/r_9202376.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 18:12:38 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Business Administration, Management, and Operations
dc.subject.disciplines Industrial and Organizational Psychology
dc.subject.keywords Psychology
dc.title The relationship of self-ratings to assessor ratings of assessment center performance
dc.type article
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 796236b3-85a0-4cde-b154-31da9e94ed42
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
r_9202376.pdf
Size:
3.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: