Referential aspects in the vocal repertoire of bonobos (<i>Pan paniscus</i>)

dc.contributor.advisor Jill Pruetz
dc.contributor.author Klag, Kathleen
dc.contributor.author Howe, Adina
dc.contributor.department Anthropology
dc.date 2018-08-11T07:45:12.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T02:29:16Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T02:29:16Z
dc.date.copyright Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2009
dc.date.embargo 2013-06-05
dc.date.issued 2009-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The complexities of animal communication continue to be investigated. However, the potential for referential communication in nonhuman great apes' vocal repertoire has only been studied in chimpanzees' (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>) food vocalizations. The current study aimed to examine whether bonobos' (<i>Pan paniscus</i>) food vocalizations contained referential aspects. Vocalizations were collected from one bonobo while feeding on one of six different food types. These vocalizations could be significantly distinguished based of food type when using a four-variable model containing low frequency, delta time, average power, and energy. They also could be reclassified into the correct food type based on these variables on a consistent basis, and most food groups were significantly distinguishable from each other. Consequently, this participant's food vocalizations suggest that bonobo food vocalizations contain information based on food type. However, this does not ensure referential vocalizations. Importantly, this study did not examine whether listeners used this information or if these food vocalizations were intentionally elicited. This study raised many important questions regarding the study of referents in nonhuman primates. First, it demonstrated the complexity of examining referents in a nonhuman species. This included aspects related to initial assumptions, such as whether or not one is starting from a standpoint that great ape and human communication is continuous. Equally difficult is setting up or finding a situation in which you can expect a one-to-one correspondence between a stimulus or setting and one specific referent. Finally, even with a sound methodology, the question of what statistical requirements should be required in order to prove a case for nonhuman referential communication remains unclear. All of these considerations have large impacts on the interpretation of referential communication and must be scrutinized deeply before any conclusion regarding nonhuman great ape vocal referential capability can be made.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10549/
dc.identifier.articleid 1532
dc.identifier.contextkey 2802560
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-508
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath etd/10549
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/24755
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10549/Klag_iastate_0097M_10385.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 18:23:16 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Anthropology
dc.subject.keywords bonobo
dc.subject.keywords communication
dc.subject.keywords food
dc.subject.keywords primate
dc.subject.keywords referent
dc.subject.keywords vocalization
dc.title Referential aspects in the vocal repertoire of bonobos (<i>Pan paniscus</i>)
dc.type article
dc.type.genre thesis
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e2017bbe-ba62-4969-946e-aaf072d8bb4f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e5ee3e5c-0f5e-419a-9c67-0406e24ad416
thesis.degree.level thesis
thesis.degree.name Master of Arts
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Klag_iastate_0097M_10385.pdf
Size:
936.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: