Factors correlating with significant differences between X-ray structures of myoglobin

Rashin, Alexander
Domagalski, Marcin
Jernigan, Robert
Zimmermann, Michael
Minor, Wladek
Chruszcz, Maksymilian
Jernigan, Robert
Major Professor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular BiologyBaker Center for Bioinformatics and Biological Statistics

Validation of general ideas about the origins of conformational differences in proteins is critical in order to arrive at meaningful functional insights. Here, principal component analysis (PCA) and distance difference matrices are used to validate some such ideas about the conformational differences between 291 myoglobin structures from sperm whale, horse and pig. Almost all of the horse and pig structures form compact PCA clusters with only minor coordinate differences and outliers that are easily explained. The 222 whale structures form a few dense clusters with multiple outliers. A few whale outliers with a prominent distortion of the GH loop are very similar to the cluster of horse structures, which all have a similar GH-loop distortion apparently owing to intermolecular crystal lattice hydrogen bonds to the GH loop from residues near the distal histidine His64. The variations of the GH-loop coordinates in the whale structures are likely to be owing to the observed alternative intermolecular crystal lattice bond, with the change to the GH loop distorting bonds correlated with the binding of specific ‘unusual’ ligands. Such an alternative intermolecular bond is not observed in horse myoglobins, obliterating any correlation with the ligands. Intermolecular bonds do not usually cause significant coordinate differences and cannot be validated as their universal cause. Most of the native-like whale myoglobin structure outliers can be correlated with a few specific factors. However, these factors do not always lead to coordinate differences beyond the previously determined uncertainty thresholds. The binding of unusual ligands by myoglobin, leading to crystal-induced distortions, suggests that some of the conformational differences between the apo and holo structures might not be ‘functionally important’ but rather artifacts caused by the binding of ‘unusual’ substrate analogs. The causes of P6 symmetry in myoglobin crystals and the relationship between crystal and solution structures are also discussed.


This article is published as Rashin, A. A., Domagalski, M. J., Zimmermann, M. T., Minor, W., Chruszcz, M. and Jernigan, R. L. (2014), Factors correlating with significant differences between X-ray structures of myoglobin. Acta Crystallographica Section D, 70: 481–491. doi: 10.1107/S1399004713028812. Posted with permission.