Why All Researchers Should Report Effect Sizes and their Confidence Intervals: Paving the Way for Meta-Analysis and Evidence-Based Management Practices

Supplemental Files
Date
2015-03-24
Authors
Schwab, Andreas
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Management
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Series
Abstract

The growing body of empirical entrepreneurship studies and the advent of meta-analytic methodologies create new opportunities to develop evidence-based management practices. To support research on evidence-based practices, empirical studies should report meta-analysis relevant information, such as standardized effect-size measures and their confidence intervals. The corresponding changes in reporting practices are simple and straight-forward – yet, they promise strong contributions to the systematic accumulation of entrepreneurship knowledge over time.

Description

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: 2015; Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4): 719–725. doi: 10.1111/etap.12158, which has been published in final form at Doi:10.1111/etap.12158. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Keywords
Citation
DOI
Collections